What is the Mathematical Definition of the Pauli Vector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Pauli vector, defined as \(\vec{\sigma}=\sigma_1 e_x+\sigma_2 e_y + \sigma_3 e_z\), utilizes unit vectors \(e_x\), \(e_y\), and \(e_z\) alongside the Pauli matrices \(\sigma_i\). The discussion clarifies that the combination of these elements is a shorthand notation rather than a strict mathematical product, similar to concepts in product groups and rings. This notation, while convenient, can be misleading as it does not represent a true vector decomposition. The analogy to relativity's \(\sigma_{\mu}\) further emphasizes the potential for confusion in interpreting these mathematical constructs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Pauli matrices
  • Familiarity with vector notation and unit vectors
  • Basic knowledge of product groups and product rings
  • Concept of shorthand notation in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about product groups and product rings in abstract algebra
  • Investigate the role of notation in mathematical physics, particularly in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of vector notation in relativity and its potential for misinterpretation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, mathematicians interested in algebraic structures, and physicists examining the implications of notation in theoretical frameworks.

Grufey
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm reading my old notes of QM, I found the definition of Pauli vector, as follow

\vec{\sigma}=\sigma_1 e_x+\sigma_2e_y + \sigma_3 e_z

Where e_x. e_y and e_z are unit vectors.

So, here is my question. \sigma_i and e_i are elements of different nature. How can we define the product \sigma_ie_i??

I understand the idea, ok. But, mathematically don't seem right

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although I am not certain what is going on, I will try. If I understand correctly, you are wondering why we can put the matrix and the vector next to each other. I think the idea is similar to product groups and product rings, which are very simple and common constructions where the behavior in one component has little to do with the behavior in the other component. For instance the product of the integers with the rationals, where addition is defined by (n,p)+(m,q)=(n+m,p+q). You might consider a product ring M x M', where M is space of 2x2 matrices, and M' is space of 3x3 matrices. If I did not get your question right, I hope this helps give ideas on how you might reword or fill us in on more about the definitions.
 
It is actually a shorthand (and misleading) notation. The "vector" you mention always appears in either a cross or a dot product in which the <units> are "coupled" with other units, this time real ones, like for momentum operators. So it's not a decomposition of a vector with respect to a basis (i,j,k or ex, ey, ez), it's just a handy notation which shortens some long expressions, i.e. i/o writing p_x \sigma_x + p_y \sigma_y + p_z \sigma_z one writes \displaystyle{\vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{p}}.
 
Sorry I was too busy this week and I could not reply before.

That's what I thought, it's only a notation. misleading notation.

Regards
 
The same thing happens in relativity, where you have the \sigma_{\mu}. It's no real 4-vector (1-form), just a shorthand notation which is useful, but can be misleading.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K