What is the mathematics required to learn from Feynman's Lectures?

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrTherapist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lectures Mathematics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical prerequisites and supplementary resources necessary for understanding Feynman's Lectures on Physics. Participants share their experiences and recommendations regarding the level of mathematics required, as well as additional books that could enhance comprehension of the material presented in Feynman's work.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions having a calculus reference book and questions if they are prepared for Feynman's Lectures after studying physics for two years.
  • Another participant suggests that comfort with calculus, including multi-variable calculus and partial derivatives, is sufficient for understanding the lectures.
  • Several participants inquire about additional books that could supplement Feynman's Lectures, indicating a desire for further resources.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of reviewing the lectures online to identify gaps in prerequisite knowledge, noting Feynman's teaching style progresses from approachable to more complex material.
  • Another participant expresses confidence in their understanding of the lectures and plans to purchase them soon.
  • Multiple participants highlight Feynman's genius and pedagogical style, comparing him to other historical figures in physics and noting his contributions to quantum mechanics and particle physics.
  • Some participants recommend other physics lecture series, such as Sommerfeld's and Pauli's, suggesting they are valuable resources despite being older.
  • A participant mentions George Gamov's book as a useful historical context for studying advanced physics material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the necessary mathematical background for Feynman's Lectures, with some suggesting that calculus is sufficient while others imply that additional preparation may be needed. There is no consensus on the specific supplementary materials, as different participants recommend various texts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that Feynman's lectures can become conceptually demanding, indicating that understanding may depend on the individual's prior knowledge and comfort with mathematics. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and perspectives on the prerequisites for engaging with Feynman's work.

DrTherapist
Messages
25
Reaction score
9
I have Thomas and Finney's book on Calculus for reference. Am I prepared for Feynman's Lectures? I've studied physics for two years in high school.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think so. You will need to be comfortable with calculus, including multi-variable calculus and partial derivatives. I don't think the math is any more complicated than that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and DrTherapist
What are the books that I should supplement with Feynman's Lectures?
 
Last edited:
I think you would do well to browse the lectures at http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ and let any points of departure from comprehensibility to you inform you as to where there may be gaps in your prerequisite learning. Feynman's style is often to start out with a few remarks that identify in a reasonably approachable-to-every-college-student manner, what he'll be discussing, and then to go dauntlessly into detail, becoming conceptually more abstruse and procedurally more demanding as he progresses. He's brilliant, extremely inventive, and can be a heck of a lot of fun, but if you're at all like regular folks, you'll probably have to do some of the kinds of maths he uses in order to be able to follow his elucidations. The upside of that is that having done the prep work, you'll find that his lectures present things remarkably perspicuously.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and DrTherapist
Thanks. I seem to understand the lectures pretty well. I am going to buy them pretty soon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
DrTherapist said:
What are the books that I should supplement with Feynman's Lectures?
Richard Feynman was certainly one of very few Geniuses I studied contemporary aloneside Galileo, Einstein, Newton, Bohr, Maxwell, Schrödinger, Faraday. His Genius was palpable as was his inquisitive nature, Physics was a true love of his you could feel his passion. Feynman could be proximal but part of his pedagogical style. One of the greatest physicist of the 20th Century. Brilliant, Wise, A master Professor of quantum mechanics and particle physics. While working on his Ph.D. from Princeton, he was encouraged to participate in the Manhattan Project therefore assisted in the development of the atomic bomb. Other than Differential and Integral Calculus, just read a lot of physics, most of his work was in Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics. While he was finishing his PhD the DOD/USA Gov. encouraged him to participate in the Manhattan Project and assisted in the development of the atomic bomb. He was known as the "great explainer!"
Read his written Lectures several volumes there's hours of his Caltech lectures on YouTube.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrTherapist, Science-IS and vanhees71
The Feynman lectures are indeed an all-time classic. It's only topped, in my opinion, by Sommerfeld's 6-volume "Lectures on theoretical physics", which however only include classical physics, and they are 30-40 years older than the Feynman Lectures. Very similar in style are Pauli's (also 6-volume) "Lectures on theoretical physics". Characteristically Pauli's textbooks are still not outdated although some decades old (particularly his famous encyclopedia article on "Wave Mechanics" is a gem; also his other encyclopedia article on relativity, which he wrote at an age of 21, are great; only the "relativistic thermodynamics part" is unfortunately flawed, but that's not his fault since these issues have been solved only 40 and more years later).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrTherapist
  • #10
Gregory Alan said:
Richard Feynman was certainly one of very few Geniuses I studied contemporary aloneside Galileo, Einstein, Newton, Bohr, Maxwell, Schrödinger, Faraday. His Genius was palpable as was his inquisitive nature, Physics was a true love of his you could feel his passion. Feynman could be proximal but part of his pedagogical style. One of the greatest physicist of the 20th Century. Brilliant, Wise, A master Professor of quantum mechanics and particle physics. While working on his Ph.D. from Princeton, he was encouraged to participate in the Manhattan Project therefore assisted in the development of the atomic bomb. Other than Differential and Integral Calculus, just read a lot of physics, most of his work was in Quantum Mechanics and Particle Physics. While he was finishing his PhD the DOD/USA Gov. encouraged him to participate in the Manhattan Project and assisted in the development of the atomic bomb. He was known as the "great explainer!"
Read his written Lectures several volumes there's hours of his Caltech lectures on YouTube.
Thank you. I did not know much about Feynman but now it is apparent that he was a brilliant physicist.

I will make sure to look up his lectures on YouTube. I am feeling lucky that someone like Feynman existed and gave us a gift.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
  • #11
vanhees71 said:
The Feynman lectures are indeed an all-time classic. It's only topped, in my opinion, by Sommerfeld's 6-volume "Lectures on theoretical physics", which however only include classical physics, and they are 30-40 years older than the Feynman Lectures. Very similar in style are Pauli's (also 6-volume) "Lectures on theoretical physics". Characteristically Pauli's textbooks are still not outdated although some decades old (particularly his famous encyclopedia article on "Wave Mechanics" is a gem; also his other encyclopedia article on relativity, which he wrote at an age of 21, are great; only the "relativistic thermodynamics part" is unfortunately flawed, but that's not his fault since these issues have been solved only 40 and more years later).
Thank you. The Sommerfeld's lectures are individually cheap to buy, so that's a plus point. I will also look forward buying Pauli's books.
 
  • #12
George Gamov's Thirty Years that Shook Physics (Amazon link) provides an interesting historical orientation that is well worth reading for gaining some in-advance perspective as you commence studying some of the more advanced material you're assigning yourself to read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Periwinkle and DrTherapist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K