What is the matrix representation of T ο L with respect to E?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the matrix representation of the composition of two linear transformations, T and L, given their respective matrix forms. The transformations are defined in the context of a standard basis.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of multiplying the matrices to find the composition of the transformations. There is an exploration of the underlying assumptions regarding matrix multiplication and its relation to linear transformations.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the correctness of the matrix multiplication performed by the original poster. Others provide insights into the mathematical principles behind matrix multiplication and the composition of linear transformations, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of the order of multiplication in relation to the transformations being applied, as well as the need for clarity on the definitions and assumptions involved in the problem.

crashh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem states that we have L as the linear transformation as:
\begin{align*}
A=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
2 & 0 & 1 \\
-2 & 3 & 2 \\
4 & 1 & 5
\end{array}
\right)
\end{align*}

And when given another linear transformation T as:
\begin{align*}
B=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-3 & 1 & 0 \\
2 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & -1 & 3
\end{array}
\right)
\end{align*}

Then find the matrix representation of T ο L with respect to E(which is the standard basis, as are both transformations).

T ο L is the composition of T and L.

Homework Equations


I assumed you could just multiply the two matrices togeather, as they share the same basis, thus getting the composition of the two lineartransformations?

The Attempt at a Solution


\begin{align*}
T&=B=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-3 & 1 & 0 \\
2 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & -1 & 3
\end{array}
\right)\\
L&=A=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
2 & 0 & 1 \\
-2 & 3 & 2 \\
4 & 1 & 5
\end{array}
\right)\\
\end{align*}

\begin{align*}
BA&=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-3 & 1 & 0 \\
2 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & -1 & 3
\end{array}
\right)
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
2 & 0 & 1 \\
-2 & 3 & 2 \\
4 & 1 & 5
\end{array}
\right)\\
&=
\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-8 & 3 & -1 \\
8 & 1 & 7 \\
14 & 0 & 13
\end{array}
\right)
\end{align*}

Or is this completely wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check that you multiplied the matrices together correctly, but assuming you did, that's the right answer.
 
crashh said:
I assumed you could just multiply the two matrices togeather, as they share the same basis, thus getting the composition of the two lineartransformations?
No need to assume it. The number on row i, column j of the matrix corresponding to an arbitrary linear operator A is ##A_{ij}=\langle e_i,Ae_j\rangle##. So
\begin{align}
&(T\circ L)_{ij}=\langle e_i,(T\circ L)e_j\rangle =\langle e_i,T(Le_j)\rangle =\left\langle e_i,T\left(\sum_k \langle e_k,Le_j\rangle e_k\right)\right\rangle\\
&=\sum_k\langle e_k,Le_j\rangle \langle e_i,Te_k\rangle =\sum_k L_{kj}T_{ik} =\sum_k T_{ik}L_{kj}.
\end{align}
 
Yes, that is the correct product of the two matrices. One way to remember how to multiply matrices is to think of the rows of the first matrix and the columns of the second matrix as "vectors". If a_{ij} is the number in the i row, j column of the product matrix, then a_{ij} is the dot product of the i row of the first matrix and the j column of the second matrix.

For example, the first row of the first matrix, B, is <-3, 1, 0> and the first column of the second matrix, A, is <2, -, 4> so the number in the first row, first column, of BA is (-3)(2)+ 1(-2)+ 0(4)= -8 as you have.

And, of course, the order of the multiplication (BA rather than AB) is important because matrix multiplication is NOT commutative. The multiplication of the matrices must be the same as the order in which the transformation are applied.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
992