MHB What is the maximum area of the circular sector with a perimeter of 12 cm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the maximum area of a circular sector with a perimeter of 12 cm, expressed as functions of both the central angle θ and the radius r. The area of the sector is initially expressed incorrectly, but the correct function for A(θ) is given as A(θ) = (72θ)/(2 + θ)², which is not quadratic. For A(r), the correct expression is A(r) = 6r - r², which is identified as a quadratic function. Participants seek clarification on the steps to maximize the area and confirm the relationships between perimeter and area formulas. The conversation emphasizes understanding the correct expressions and their implications for maximizing the sector's area.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The given picture shows a circular sector with radius r cm and central angle θ (radian measure). The perimeter of the sector is 12 cm.

1. Express the area A of the sector as a function of θ. Is this a quadratic function?

2. Express the area A of the sector as a function of r. Is this a quadratic function?

3. For which value of r is the area A a maximum? What is the corressponding value of θ in this case?

Part 1

I know the area of the sector formula is A = (1/2) r^2 θ.

I simply thought the answer must be A(θ) = (1/2) r^2 θ but then I said no because the radius square should not be as part of the answer. The question is asking to express the area A of the sector as a function of theta not a function of r and θ.

The book's answer is A(θ) = (72 θ)/(2 + θ)^2. Of course, this is not a quadratic function. Where did this fraction come from? Where did 72 and 6 come from?

Part 2

Again, I quickly jumped to conclusion since I know the area of a sector formula to be A = (1/2) r^2 θ.

I said, ok, the answer must be A(r) = (1/2) r^2 θ. There it is. It is written in terms of r. I am wrong, of course. You see, θ should not be part of the answer if we must express the area A as a function of r not a function of r and θ.

The book's answer is A(r) = 6r - r^2. I recognize this to be a quadratic function. Where did 6 come from?

Part 3

I need the steps for Part 3 that will guide me to the answer. Can someone provide me with the steps?

View attachment 7911
 

Attachments

  • sDraw_2018-03-07_02-30-49.png
    sDraw_2018-03-07_02-30-49.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 103
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We know the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=2r+r\theta=(2+\theta)r\tag{1}$$

The area is:

$$A=\frac{1}{2}r^2\theta\tag{2}$$

(1) gives is a way to relate $r$ and $\theta$. So:

1.) solve (1) for $r$, and substitute for $r$ into (2) to get $A(\theta)$. Now, you will also have the parameter $P$ present, but it has been given, so you can just plug that in once you get the formula. What do you get?

2.) solve (1) for $\theta$, and substitute for $\theta$ into (2) to get $A(r)$. Now, as before, you will also have the parameter $P$ present, but it has been given, so you can just plug that in once you get the formula. What do you get?
 
You say solve 1 for r and plug for r into 2.
Then you said to solve 1 for theta and plug for theta into 2.

Do you mean that 1 here represents the perimeter of the sector formula and 2 the area of the sector formula?

If so, I will try later tonight after work.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top