What Is the Maximum Force to Prevent the Top Block from Slipping?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to a bottom block without causing a top block to slip, given a coefficient of static friction. The correct approach involves recognizing that the top block can only accelerate to a certain limit before slipping occurs, which is determined by the maximum static friction force. The user initially miscalculated the force needed by not accounting for the total mass of both blocks when applying Newton's second law. The correct total mass to consider is 7 kg (5 kg for the bottom block and 2 kg for the top block), leading to the realization that the applied force must account for this combined mass. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between the blocks and the forces acting on them clarifies the solution.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Figure 6-36: http://www.webassign.net/walker/06-36alt.gif

5. [Walker2 6.P.071.] Two blocks, stacked one on top of the other, slide on a frictionless, horizontal surface (Figure 6-36), where M = 5.0 kg. The surface between the two blocks is rough, however, with a coefficient of static friction equal to 0.47.

If a horizontal force F is applied to the bottom block, what is the maximum value F can have before the 2.0 kg top block begins to slip?

The answer in the back of the book is 32 N. But that's not what I get. I get the same wrong answer 2 different ways:


friction = mu * mg
friction = 0.47 * 2 * 9.81
friction = 9.2214 N

at this point, I'm stuck.

I'd like to say that if pushing the 2 kg block with a force of 9.2214 will move it, then how much harder would I have to push a 5 kg block to make its push equivalent to the 2 kg push.

9.2214 * (5/2) = 23.0535 which is the wrong answer.

Or I could do it like this:

f=ma
9.2214 = 2 * a

a = 4.6107

now use this for a for the 5 kg block

F = ma
F = 5 * 4.6107
F = 23.0535 which is exactly what I got before and it is wrong

Any thoughts...??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are very close. What is the maximum acceleration that the top block can have? (You already figured that out--that's when the frictional force on it is at maximum.) Now treat the two blocks as a single object (why not?). What force F is required to accelerate both blocks to that value?

(One of your mistakes was using F = ma, but not using the net force on the object. If you treat the bottom block by itself -- nothing wrong with that! -- don't forget that there are two horizontal forces on it. Recall Newton's 3rd law.)
 
Doc Al said:
You are very close. What is the maximum acceleration that the top block can have? (You already figured that out--that's when the frictional force on it is at maximum.) Now treat the two blocks as a single object (why not?). What force F is required to accelerate both blocks to that value?

(One of your mistakes was using F = ma, but not using the net force on the object. If you treat the bottom block by itself -- nothing wrong with that! -- don't forget that there are two horizontal forces on it. Recall Newton's 3rd law.)
Thanks, Doc (again!)
lol... I feel so stupid for not realizing that I'm pushing 7kg, and not 5 ! I stared at this for an hour.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
875
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K