What is the maximum frictional force?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum frictional force on a block on a 35-degree incline is calculated incorrectly in the referenced book "Advance Physics for You." The correct calculation involves recognizing that the weight of the block is already given as 120N, and thus, multiplying by 9.81 (the acceleration due to gravity) is unnecessary and incorrect. The correct frictional force should be determined using the sine component of the angle, resulting in a value of 69N, not 675N as stated in the book.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as force, weight, and friction.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and cosine.
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion.
  • Ability to interpret and analyze physics problems involving inclined planes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of frictional force and its calculation on inclined planes.
  • Study the differences between mass and weight in physics.
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric functions in physics problems.
  • Explore common misconceptions in physics textbooks and how to correct them.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators looking to clarify concepts of force and friction, and anyone interested in correcting common errors in physics textbooks.

Shaye
Messages
20
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
The block in the diagram weighs 120N. It will start to slip down the slope when the component of it's weight acting down the slop equals the maximum frictional force. If the block slips when the angle Θ = 35 degrees what is the maximum frictional force?
Relevant Equations
Sin(Θ)*Opposite = Hypotenuse and F=Ma
In the attachment I am supposed to calculate the maximum frictional force of a block on a 35 degree angle incline (that is the point at which the force acting opposite frictional force is highest)

I make it out to be sin(35)*120N = 69N but the book says 675N and it gives it as cost(55)*120N*9.81. But given F=Ma how so?

I don't understand this or something has slipped my mind. The diagonal force component (hypotenuse) should be 69N because the veridical component is 120N.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 20201107_163943.jpg
    20201107_163943.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 182
Physics news on Phys.org
The book has confused weight with mass in producing their answer. They've erroneously multiplied the weight in Newtons by 9.81, or g. One multiplies a mass by g to get force due to gravity. But they've provided that force already as a weight of 120 N.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shaye and TSny
What book is this? I am thinking of creating a Physics Forum page of book corrections.
 
gneill said:
The book has confused weight with mass in producing their answer. They've erroneously multiplied the weight in Newtons by 9.81, or g. One multiplies a mass by g to get force due to gravity. But they've provided that force already as a weight of 120 N.

Phew! Thanks. I thought I was going mad
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K