What Is The Meaning Of 0 In Math?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caprija
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of the number zero in mathematics, particularly in relation to whether it is considered positive, negative, or neither. Participants explore implications for programming and the representation of zero in various contexts, including computer science and mathematical definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that zero is nonnegative and nonpositive, and question if there is a specific term for it.
  • Others suggest that a program should output "0 is neither positive nor negative" when zero is entered.
  • A few participants humorously propose outputs like "0 is going commando" or a blue screen error for a program handling zero.
  • There are discussions about the implications of zero in signed number representations, with some noting that in signed 2's complement, zero may be treated as positive.
  • One participant argues that zero represents the absence of quantity and cannot be negative, while another challenges this by discussing the difference between leaving a field blank versus entering zero.
  • Some participants debate whether zero should be classified as a natural number, with no consensus on the definition across different fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of zero, particularly regarding its status as a natural number and its representation in programming. There is no consensus on whether zero should be considered positive, negative, or a separate category.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying definitions of positive and negative numbers, the implications of zero in programming contexts, and the absence of universal conventions regarding zero's classification in mathematics.

caprija
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
In a whole number you can say whether it's negative or positive right?

So what would you call 0?

would it just be called zero?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
0 is nonnegative and nonpositive, and it is the only such integer.
 
Hurkyl said:
0 is nonnegative and nonpositive, and it is the only such integer.
so is there a term for it??

I have to make a computer program that outputs whether the number is positive or negative, so when the user enters zero what should it output?
 
A blue screen with fatal exception error, followed by automatic reboot.
 
Galileo said:
A blue screen with fatal exception error, followed by automatic reboot.
but shouldn't the program output a different term when the number zero is typed in?
 
Why not just have the program output: "0 is neither positive nor negative"
 
You could have the user ask "Is x positive or negative?" and when x is 0, instead of saying "positive" or "negative", just say "no".
 
StatusX said:
You could have the user ask "Is x positive or negative?" and when x is 0, instead of saying "positive" or "negative", just say "no".

So it would be sort of like the boxer/briefs paradox?
 
hypermonkey2 said:
So it would be sort of like the boxer/briefs paradox?

Yea, same idea. Although I'm less troubled by the fact that 0 is neither positive or negative.
 
  • #10
"0 is going commando" seems like the appropriate output.
 
  • #11
caprija said:
I have to make a computer program that outputs whether the number is positive or negative, so when the user enters zero what should it output?

Galileo said:
A blue screen with fatal exception error, followed by automatic reboot.

caprija said:
but shouldn't the program output a different term when the number zero is typed in?

It was a joke, son, a joke! (And, in my opinion, a good one.)

I would vote for responding "neither".
 
  • #12
hypermonkey2 said:
So it would be sort of like the boxer/briefs paradox?
Exactly!
It is what is INSIDE that is important; externals like the labels "positive/negative" are unimportant stuff. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #13
caprija said:
but shouldn't the program output a different term when the number zero is typed in?

It would probably output something along the lines of this:


http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y100/Robokapp/untitledfff.jpg

But honestly, although it should stay blank, it will...probably say something. I mean let's look at it this way, it's a positive thing to have zero debts, but it's negative to have zero income...I guess it's up to the maker's financiar life...

This should be in the psychology section.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
If the computer is using signed 2's Complement for number representation, then 0 will interpreted as a positive. Negative numbers would be the ones where the most significant bit is 1. Thus, 0 would be positive.
Some number representations have both a negative 0 and a positive 0, for example. But signed 2's complement is a popular representation, and your best bet is that 0 is a positive number, if this is for a Computer Science course.
 
  • #15
In all honesty I think the problem lays in the meaning of the worlds "positive" and "negative". No matter how we look at it 0 won't turn negative... because it obviously involves a missing quantity. zero is the absence of quantity so nothing can't be missing.

wikipedia said:
In mathematics, a number is called positive if its value is greater than zero. See negative and non-negative numbers.

wikipedia said:
Zero is neither positive nor negative, neither a prime number nor a composite number, nor is it a unit. If zero is excluded from the rational numbers, the real numbers or the complex numbers, the remaining numbers form an abelian group under multiplication.

Now the last part of the second quote didn't look like english to me but...i quoted the whole paragraph...
 
  • #16
Robokapp said:
it's a positive thing to have zero debts, but it's negative to have zero income
Equivocation. :-p Your usage of those English words has absolutely nothing to do with the mathematical terms.



In all honesty I think the problem lays in the meaning of the worlds "positive" and "negative".
I assume you meant "words". Positive means bigger than zero. Negative means less than zero. What's the problem with that?


zero is the absence of quantity
No, it is not. For example, when filling out a form, there's a huge difference between leaving

Children: _____

blank (absence of quantity), and filling it in

Children: __0__

with a zero.


The only "problem" here is that natural language likes to single out small quantities linguistically. "Zero" isn't the only word with this problem: "one" also has a lot of specialized language associated with it (not to mention the different spellings required for many unspecialized words). And even "two", "three", and "four" have some specialized words associated with them.
 
  • #17
Children: __Maybe__
 
  • #18
Positive and negative numbers are just 2 states of integers/real numbers. Then there is 0! Numbers are really in tri-state and zero is the bridge joining positives to negatives. So the output must be either positive, negative or zero.

However in computer science you are forced to accept that zero is a positive number since it is sometimes considered to be a natural number and is grouped with the positive numbers. So to conserve space of bits in registers they use just one bit (0 or 1) to describe the sign of the number instead of 2 bits (4 values) to include the zero state as well.

Is zero a natural number?
 
  • #19
No, zero is not a natural number.
 
  • #20
There's no universal convention on whether 0 is a natural number or not. Some authors include it, some don't.
 
  • #21
Is the word "neither" too complicated for you?
 
  • #22
shmoe said:
There's no universal convention on whether 0 is a natural number or not. Some authors include it, some don't.

Doesn't that vary mostly by field, though? Number theorists say one thing, etc.
 
  • #23
HallsofIvy said:
Is the word "neither" too complicated for you?
:smile: It's too difficult to "swallow" although it makes sense...
 
  • #24
CRGreathouse said:
Doesn't that vary mostly by field, though? Number theorists say one thing, etc.

Probably it varies much less within a given field, but it can still vary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K