Undergrad What is the meaning of gradient WRT a fixed point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teroenza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of the gradient with respect to a fixed point, specifically in the context of potential energy functions in classical mechanics. The gradient, denoted as \nabla_{1}, refers to the calculation of partial derivatives of the potential energy function V(x1, y1, z1, x2, y2, z2) concerning the position of particle 1 (x1, y1, z1). It is emphasized that while calculating this gradient, the positions of particle 2 (x2, y2, z2) are treated as constants. This understanding resolves confusion regarding the interpretation of gradients in relation to fixed points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with gradient concepts in multivariable calculus
  • Basic knowledge of potential energy functions in classical mechanics
  • Experience with functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about gradient vectors and their physical interpretations in mechanics
  • Explore potential energy functions and their dependencies on multiple variables
  • Investigate fixed point theory in the context of classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of gradients and potential energy functions in multivariable calculus.

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5
My textbook (Taylor, Classical Mechanics) and professor introduced the concept of \nabla_{1}

to mean "the gradient of the function (potential energy) with respect to the position (x_{1},y_{1},z_{1}) of particle 1.

I do not understand this. I am familiar with partial derivatives and gradients with respect to general x,y,and z, but not with respect to a fixed point. I could not find anything from my calculus book to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not gradient with respect to a fixed point. It's just that the potential energy is a function of both the position of particle 1 and the position of particle 2, so you could write V(x1,y1,z1,x2,y2,z2). When he says gradient with respect to the position of particle 1, he means we should calculate partial derivatives with respect to x1, y1, and z1, not x2, y2, and z2.
 
Ok so it would be just a regular gradient, but WRT particle 1 means I treat x2,y2,z2 as constants. Thanks
 
teroenza said:
Ok so it would be just a regular gradient, but WRT particle 1 means I treat x2,y2,z2 as constants. Thanks
Yes, exactly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K