What Is the Method for Finding the Potential of a Spherical Dipole?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Griffiths' electrodynamics problem 3.22, which involves finding the potential inside and outside a spherical shell with a uniform charge distribution. The method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates is employed, leading to a Fourier series solution with coefficients derived from Legendre polynomials. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying boundary conditions and integrating Legendre polynomials over the appropriate intervals to derive the coefficients A_l and B_l explicitly up to A6 and B6.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Griffiths' Electrodynamics, specifically problem 3.22
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and the method of separation of variables
  • Knowledge of Fourier series and Legendre polynomials
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of coefficients A_l and B_l in Griffiths' Electrodynamics
  • Practice integrating Legendre polynomials over the intervals [0, π/2] and [π/2, π]
  • Explore the application of boundary conditions in electrostatics problems
  • Learn advanced LaTeX coding for better presentation of mathematical equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electrodynamics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of spherical harmonics and potential theory in electrostatics.

Goddar
Messages
202
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


(Griffith' electrodynamics, problem 3.22): a spherical shell (radius R) carries uniform charge sigma0 on the "northern" hemisphere, –sigma0 on the "southern" one. Find the potential inside and outside the sphere, calculating coefficients explicitly up to A6 and B6.


Homework Equations


Attached document: i don't know how to paste equations on this page, it's my first time.. for reference, it's the same basic solution developed for example 3.9 of the book, p.142


The Attempt at a Solution


the above makes reference the method of separation of variables (in spherical coordinates), with solution in the form of a Fourier series with coefficients involving legendre polynomials (variable = "cosine theta"): since the charge density is constant over each hemisphere, i end-up with no polynomial at all.. While an infinite series seems expected (this would be more clear if i could paste my equations); i guess i don't know where to plug-in the right boundary condition.. Anybody could enlight me?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
For a tutorial in LaTeX coding:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997

Well, in getting to the point where you are at, you have already used all the boundary conditions that you can (maybe you should review what Griffiths does to get to the A_l and B_l correlation).

The good news is that you're doing fine. Since it is crappy to integrate a legendre polynomial between 0 and pi, you will want to use a trick to change it so it is between -1 and 1. If you want to see it then look down, but if you want to work on it yourself then don't look.


[tex]A_l = \frac{\sigma_0}{2 \epsilon_0 R^{l-1}}(\int_0^{\pi/2}P_l(cos \theta)sin \theta d \theta - \int_{pi/2}^\pi P_l(cos \theta)sin \theta d \theta)[/tex]
and let x=cosØ
 
Hi, thank you for the answer! i was thinking about this kind of solution but the reasoning of the text (that's probably what i got wrong) seems to suggest that since:
Code:
[tex] \sigma\_0 (cos\theta\) = constant = \sigma\_0 P_0 (cos\theta\) [tex]

(of course that's for theta between 0 and pi/2, otherwise it's the same, but negative constant)
Then all coefficients are zero except for l = 0, but then the two integrals just reduce to:

Code:
[tex] A_l =\sigma\_0 /\epsilon\_0 [tex]
Now if I'm not supposed to kill off the polynomials, i guess i just end up with the whole infinite series, for which the formula is straightforward...
(take you for the LaTex link, too, i hope i used it right..)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K