What is the method for finding the reciprocal function of a quadratic function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JPC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Reciprocal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the reciprocal (inverse) function of a quadratic function, specifically in the form f(x) = ax² + bx + c. Participants explore various methods and approaches to derive the inverse function, including algebraic manipulations and considerations of function properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the term "reciprocal function" is often confused with "inverse function," which is defined as g is the inverse function of f if f(g(x)) = x.
  • One participant suggests that to find the inverse, one should isolate x in the equation y = ax² + bx + c.
  • Another participant mentions that swapping x and y and then solving for y is a common method, while others prefer to solve for x first before swapping.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of one-to-one functions for having inverses, with examples provided to illustrate that quadratics typically yield two values for a given y.
  • Some participants propose completing the square as a method to solve for y, while others question the handling of coefficients in the quadratic equation.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the hints provided, indicating that they found the discussion helpful in solving their problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to isolate variables and the importance of one-to-one functions for inverses. However, there are multiple competing views on the methods to achieve this, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to derive the inverse of a quadratic function.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the function's domain to ensure it is one-to-one, as well as unresolved mathematical steps in deriving the inverse function from the quadratic form.

JPC
Messages
204
Reaction score
1
reciprocal functions ??

hey

is this true with finding reciprocal functions :

f(x) initial function , g(x) reciprocal function of f(x)

if f(x) = a x^n
then
g(x) = ( xroot(n, x) ) / ( xroot(n, a)

but now
if f(x) = ax²+ bx + c

how do i find its reciprocal function ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By reciprocal do you mean inverse, defined as "g is the inverse function of f if f(g(x)) = x"?
 
yes i think, i mean like :
if f(x) = Y

then g(Y) = x

(sorry if its the wrong vocab, but I am in a french school)
 
Okay, in English it's "inverse function," written f-1.

How do you solve for f-1? If you have y = (an expression with x and no y) then your goal is to obtain x = (an expression with y and no x). For this to work, it is necessary to isolate x. For example, if you have y = ax^2 + bx + c then you need to turn this into an equation with 0 = ax^2 + bx + c - y. Now, what is a method to solve this equation, so that x = (an expression with a, b, c, y)?
 
EnumaElish was on the right track, but all he is doing was writing the same function, but with the subject being x instead of y. For the inverse or reciprocal function, replace all the x's with y's and vice versa, then make the subject y, which is done with EnumaElish's hint.
 
Some people, my self and apparently Gib Z, prefer to first swap x and y, and solve for y. Others, like EunumaElish solve for x first, then swap x and y. It's six of one, half dozen of the other.
 
O Sorry it's just that from EnumaElish's post i thought that he wasn't going to end up swapping the x and y's. If he was, then it would be correct.
 
Last edited:
The way I was taught was to first turn the equation around, then re-label.
 
yes buyt how do i do it after :

ax²+ bx + c = y

ax² + bx = y - c

i need to get it into the form of x = ... (with y on this side)
 
  • #10
Correct. And you need an individual x on the left. So, how do you express individual x when your equation is a quadratic polynomial?
 
  • #11
Remember that only one-to-one functions have inverses!

You can solve ax²+ bx + c = y using the quadratic formula- that typically gives two values because quadratics are typically not one-to-one functions.

To take an easy example, if y= x^2 then [itex]x= \pm \sqrt{y}[/itex]- which is not a function. When we "really, really" want to have an inverse, what we normally do is create two new functions f(x)= x2 for [itex]x\ge 0[/itex] and g(x)= x2 for [itex]x\le 0[/itex]. The inverse of f is [itex]f^{-1}(x)= \sqrt{x}[/itex] and the inverse of g is [itex]g^{-1}(x)= -\sqrt{x}[/itex].
 
  • #12
(Continuing from Hall's Post)

Or you can limit the domain of the quadratic function so that it is one to one in the new domain, and define its inverse function only from that domain.
 
  • #13
try to complete the square
if [tex]x^2 + 2 a x = y[/tex]
then we can do [tex]x ^2 + 2 a x + a^2 = y + a^2; (x+a)^2 = y + a^2[/tex]
you should be able to go on after this. Just one little caution then you are done
 
  • #14
Leon1127,
nice job there, but [tex](x+a)^2 = y + a^2[/tex] doesn't solve for x. How do you derive x from that equation? Are you still considering the coef b in your equation?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
mikemen said:
Leon1127,
nice job there, but [tex](x+a)^2 = y + a^2[/tex] doesn't solve for x. How do you derive x from that equation? Are you still considering the coef b in your equation?

Square root and subtract a from both sides.
 
  • #16
but where have u put the rest ; b and c :

i mean reciprocal functions for functions of the type : y= ax² + bx + c

so if we replace :

x= ay² + by + c
ay²+ by = c - x

but now i don't know how i can get y on the form of y = ...
 
  • #17
Can you solve for y in ay²+ by + d = 0 where d = -(c - x) ?
 
  • #18
Yeah. I solved it last nite. Thanks guys. This was the only forum on the entire net I found a hint to solve this problem! keep up the good work.
 
  • #19
EnumaElish said:
Can you solve for y in ay²+ by + d = 0 where d = -(c - x) ?

oh yes
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K