Dadface
- 2,489
- 105
We seem agree on this point. If its understood that the minimum force cannot be bigger than mg no other FBD is needed.Mister T said:Doesn't matter. Prior to taking the test the prepared students would be familiar with FBD's. This one is so simple they could picture it in their head without drawing it. And even if they did draw it, it would take only a few seconds.
Even if there were students who didn't know about μ they could still come to the right response by looking at the four given equations. By doing so they should realize that μ is a dimensionless number and that the correct answer should apply whatever its value.Mister T said:But they would need to know something about ##\mu## to understand the significance of it being greater than one.
You don't need a knowledge of FBDs and static friction. You do need to know that the minimum force cannot be bigger than mg and that μ is an unspecified number.Mister T said:Yes. and the clever ones would take the shortcut. But only if they had previously built up a knowledge of static friction and FBD's.
You have still not addressed the pedagogical issue of how a student could reason through that shortcut without first having built up a knowledge of static friction and FBD's.
it might seem to be a strange sort of question in that it's not really testing students knowledge of FBDs and friction but it is a multiple choice question and there would be a limited average available time for its solution.
Last edited: