What is the minimum number of Polarizers needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter ah011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum number of polarizers required to reduce the intensity of polarized light to less than 9% of its original value after passing through multiple polarizers. The first polarizer is rotated 25° relative to the incident light, with each subsequent polarizer also rotated by 25° from the previous one. Participants suggest using the formula for intensity after each polarizer, which involves the cosine squared of the angles. There is confusion regarding the mention of 9 degrees, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup. The thread highlights the need for clarity in the arrangement of the polarizers to solve the intensity reduction challenge effectively.
ah011
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A polarized light is incident on several polarizing disks whose planes are parallel and centred on common axis. Suppose that the transmission axis of the first polarizer is rotated 25° relative to the axis of polarization of the incident light, and that the transmission axis of each additional analyzer is rotated 25° relative to the transmission axis of the previous one. What is the minimum number of polarizer needed (whole number), so the transmitted light through all polarizing sheets has an intensity that is less than 9% that striking the first polarizer?

Homework Equations


upload_2016-3-9_19-33-10.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the question is asking for the number of polarizers needed, you start by looking at 25 degrees take the cos^2(25). Then, since they are parallel and centered on a common axis it must be added to cos^2(25-9). I am not sure what to do after this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone reply this question is making me tear my hair out
 
Hint : Intensity after passing through one polarizer is I0cos2250, after the second, I0cos4250, ...Do you see a general formula for the intensity after passing through x polarizers?

Also, you typically don't want to be the first one to reply to your own thread. It is no longer visible in the 'Unanswered Threads' column, and people are less likely to visit this thread.
 
ah011 said:
Then, since they are parallel and centered on a common axis it must be added to cos^2(25-9).
That's a very strange conclusion. Where did you get the 9 degrees from? It makes me think you misunderstand the arrangement.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K