Intensity after different polarizers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 567179551
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an unpolarized beam of light passing through a series of four ideal polarizing filters, with each subsequent filter rotated by 30 degrees relative to the previous one. The task is to determine the reduction in intensity after the light passes through all the polarizers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Malus' Law and the importance of the angles between the polarizers. Questions arise regarding the reference points for the angles and the implications of the final polarizer's orientation on the transmitted intensity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of how the polarizers affect the intensity of light. Some guidance has been provided regarding the calculation of intensity reduction, but there is no explicit consensus on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the reference angles for the polarizers and the assumption that the last polarizer will completely block the light, which is being questioned by other participants.

567179551
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1.An unpolarized beam of light is incident on a stack of four ideal polarizing filters. Each of the second, third and fourth polarizers is rotated by 30.0o relative to the preceding polarizer. In this way, the axis of the first polarizer is perpendicular to the axis of the fourth polarizer in the stack. Calculate the fraction by which the incident intensity is reduced after going through the polarizers.

The first polarizer will be vertical which will 1/2 the intensity; the second will be at 60° so
1/2(cos60°squared)=1/8; the third will be at 30° so 1/8(cos30°squared)=3/32; the last polarizer is horizontal and am not sure as to how much the intensity will be reduced. cos(0°)=1, so do I multiply 3/32 by 1 to get the final intensity of the light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first polarizer will be vertical which will 1/2 the intensity; the second will be at 60°
60° relative to what? Is that important?
You see this problem at the last polarizer: it will reduce the intensity...
 
The angle for Malus' Law is the angle between the incident light and the polarizer axis.

It is not the angle with respect to some arbitrary coordinate axis (such as the horizontal axis, like you seem to have used).

Every time linearly polarized light passes through a linear polarizer, the light that comes out is polarized along the angle of polarizer, regardless of what the initial angle was.

To exemplify this, consider a vertical polarizer, followed by a polarizer at 45 degrees, and finally a horizontal polarizer.

Suppose after the first polarizer we have intensity I_0 polarized vertically.

After the second polarizer we'd have intensity I_0(\cos 45^\circ)^2 polarized at 45 degrees.

Now the angle from 45 degrees to the final horizontal polarizer is just 45 degrees, so the the final intensity is I_0(\cos 45^\circ)^2(\cos 45^\circ)^2 polarized horizontally.

Notice that the original polarization does not directly matter for the final calculation; only the intensity and polarization of light coming out of the second filter matters.
 
The polarizers are changing in 30 degree increments relative to the preceding polarizer; vertical (90),60,30,horizontal. I am sure that the last polarizer (horizontal) will eliminate any light from getting through, am I correct?
 
No, you're not correct. See what I wrote above. Notice that even though there is a 90 degree difference between the first and last polarizer, some light still gets through. You might think of it like polarizer in the middle rotating the light so that some gets through the final filter. But if the one in the middle wasn't there, then none would get through the second filter.
 
ok so essentially the intensity is reduced by cos30^2 every polarizer... so (1/2)(3/4)(3/4)(3/4) = 27/128?
 
Thank you so much mfb and misterx, very much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K