What is the Minimum Uncertainty in Block's Speed on a Frictionless Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter footballfreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum uncertainty in the speed of a 1.70 kg block on a frictionless surface, given a position measurement precision of 0.30 cm. Participants explore the application of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, noting that the correct conversion of position uncertainty to speed uncertainty is crucial. Errors in calculations arise from misinterpreting the relationship between speed and velocity, as well as incorrect unit conversions. One participant asserts they consistently arrive at a speed uncertainty of 1.62E-32, but others challenge the accuracy of this result. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying quantum mechanics principles to classical mechanics problems.
footballfreak
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.70 kg block rests on the icy surface of a frozen pond, which you can assume to be frictionless. If the location of the block is measured to a precision of 0.30 cm, what is the minimum uncertainty in the block's speed, assuming the mass is known exactly?


Homework Equations


xp=h/4(3.14)


The Attempt at a Solution


xp=h/4(3.14)
x(mv)=h/4(3.14)
I plugged in all the values and got v. The answer was wrong. I then multiplies by .0003 and that was also wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
potential sources of error # 1:
0.3 cm = 0.003 meters, not 0.0003 meters


potential source of error # 2
they ask you for uncertainty in speed, while the equation for momentum p = mu considers VELOCITY
an uncertainty in speed of 10m/s , for example, is equal to an uncertainty in velocity of 20 m/s, since a speed up to 10 m/s implies a range of velocities from -10m/s to +10m/s
so try multiplying the speed by 2 :) (edit: or rather, try dividing the uncertainty in velocity you get by 2 to get the uncertainty in speed, since the block moves in both directions)
 
1.03E-32 the velocity by 2 and got 5.16E-33 which is wrong by 10% to 100%.

I used .003 meters.
 
are you sure your math is right? using the version of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle that you've provided (there are many variations of it) and the values for m and deltax youve given,
i get an uncertainty in velocity of 3.24807255 × 10-32
which is an uncertainty in speed of 1.62403627 × 10-32
 
The math is right i did a million times. 1.62E-32 is wrong and it was last my chance. thanks, anways...
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top