What is the mistake in this proof?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying mistakes in a proof involving the imaginary unit \( i \) and the properties of square roots in the context of complex numbers. Participants explore the implications of defining \( i \) as \( \sqrt{-1} \) and the validity of manipulating square roots of negative numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof that leads to the incorrect conclusion that \( i^2 = 1 \), prompting the discussion.
  • Some participants argue that the error lies in misunderstanding the behavior of square roots, particularly regarding branches of square roots in the complex plane.
  • Another participant suggests that defining \( i \) as \( \sqrt{-1} \) is insufficient because there are two complex numbers whose square is -1.
  • One participant explains that when squaring a complex number, it involves multiplying by its conjugate, while another disputes this interpretation.
  • There is a discussion about the validity of the equation \( \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \sqrt{ab} \), with some participants asserting it only holds for non-negative real numbers.
  • A later reply clarifies that the confusion arises from applying properties of square roots to complex numbers without considering their unique characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of square roots in the complex domain, with no consensus reached on the validity of the original proof or the interpretation of square roots.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of square roots in the complex plane and the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps in the proof presented.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
what's wrong with the following proof:

[tex]i = \sqrt\left(-1\right)[/tex]
[tex]i.i = \sqrt{\left(-1\right)}.\sqrt{\left(-1\right)}[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = \sqrt\left(-1\right).\left(-1\right)[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = \sqrt 1[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = 1[/tex]

but we know that i2 = -1
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Oh dear god not again.

There must be one of these a week.

Given you've put a 'winking' thing there we assume you know what is wrong with it (branches of square roots). Which makes this thread bloody annoying.
 
sorry, the winking thing was UNintended. i meant to give the "question mark". i really don't know what's wrong with this. so any help will be appreciated.
 
I told you: branches. Square roots don't behave like that. There is no reason to suppose they do. This demonstrates that they don't. It's only confusing if you think it must be true and there is no reason to suppose that.
 
can you please explain what you mean by branches?

and what about this:
[tex]i = \left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i.i = \left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}.\left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = \left(\left(-1\right).\left(-1\right)\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex] (since apbp = (ab)p)
[tex]i^2 = 1^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = 1[/tex]
 
When you square a complex number, you are actually multiplying it by its conjugate. If the number is a+bi then its conjugate is a-bi. In this case, a=0 and b=1. If you substitute them into your equation, the error should be abundantly clear.
 
From a different viewpoint: It is not sufficient to define "[itex]i= \sqrt{-1}[/itex]" because there are two complex numbers whose square is -1. Since the complex numbers do not form an ordered field, we cannot distinguish between them by saying "the positive root" as we do in real numbers.

Better definition of complex numbers: the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (a, b) with addition defined "coordinate wise"- (a,b)+ (c,d)= (a+c, b+d)- and multiplication defined by (a,b)(c,d)= (ac- bd,ad+bc). Identify the real number, a, with (a, 0) to make the real numbers a subset and then i= (0, 1). i*i= (0,1)(0,1)= (0*0-1*1,0*1+1*0)= (-1, 0). With those definitions, it is not in general true that [itex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}= \sqrt{ab}[/itex].
 
so the 3rd line of the following is wrong?

[tex]i = \left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i.i = \left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}.\left(-1\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = \left(\left(-1\right).\left(-1\right)\right)^{1 \over 2}[/tex] (since apbp = (ab)p)
[tex]i^2 = 1^{1 \over 2}[/tex]
[tex]i^2 = 1[/tex]
 
Yes. The third line is wrong.
 
  • #10
grant9076 said:
When you square a complex number, you are actually multiplying it by its conjugate


No, you are not.
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
Identify the real number, a, with (a, 0) to make the real numbers a subset and then i= (0, 1). i*i= (0,1)(0,1)= (0*0-1*1,0*1+1*0)= (-1, 0). With those definitions, it is not in general true that [itex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \sqrt{ab}[/itex]
can you please give me a specific example where [itex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}[/itex] is not equal to [itex]\sqrt{ab}[/itex]?
 
  • #12
You already gave an example in your first post.
 
  • #13
matt grime said:
You already gave an example in your first post.
so [itex]\sqrt{\left(-1\right)}.\sqrt{\left(-1\right)}[/itex] is NOT equal to [itex]\sqrt{\left(-1\right).\left(-1\right)}[/itex]. is that what you mean?
 
  • #14
Essentially, the confusion is due to the fact that [tex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \sqrt{ab}[/tex] is only true when [tex]a,b \geq 0[/tex]. So, yes, in your third step you violated this essential rule.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
murshid_islam said:
so [itex]\sqrt{\left(-1\right)}.\sqrt{\left(-1\right)}[/itex] is NOT equal to [itex]\sqrt{\left(-1\right).\left(-1\right)}[/itex]. is that what you mean?

Yes, that is what he means. Safest is to only assume sqrt(ab) = sqrt(a)sqrt(b) when a, b are both positive reals.

Just to help you see why:

We can write any complex number [itex]z[/itex] in a unique way as [itex]z=re^{i\theta}[/itex] where [itex]r>0[/itex] and [itex]\theta \in [0, 2\pi)[/itex].

When [itex]x[/itex] is a nonnegative real define [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex] to be the unique nonnegative real number [itex]y[/itex] such that [itex]y^2 = x[/itex]. You can show using this definition that [itex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}[/itex] holds when [itex]a,b[/itex] are nonnegative reals. Then for any complex number [itex]z[/itex] written in the form I mentioned, we define [itex]\sqrt{z} = z^{1/2} = \sqrt{r}e^{i\theta/2}.[/itex]

So let's try out this definition. If [itex]z=-1[/itex], then we write [itex]z = e^{i\pi}[/itex], and we get [itex]\sqrt{z} = e^{i\pi / 2} = i[/itex]. As you might expect.

So what's [itex]\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1}[/itex]? Well, it's [itex]e^{i\pi/2}e^{i\pi /2} = e^{i\pi} = -1[/itex]. As you've already shown, [itex]\sqrt{(-1)(-1)} = 1[/itex], so we conclude that [itex]\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}[/itex] does not hold in general for complex [itex]a,b[/itex].

(This has all been posted in previous threads, by myself and others!)
 
Last edited:
  • #16
thanks very much for your explanation, Data. it made a lot of things clear to me.
 
  • #17
grant9076 said:
When you square a complex number, you are actually multiplying it by its conjugate. If the number is a+bi then its conjugate is a-bi. In this case, a=0 and b=1. If you substitute them into your equation, the error should be abundantly clear.
No, the square of a number is the number multiplied by itself. You are talking about getting the square of the modulus which is a completely different thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K