Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
WWGD said:Problem I see isthe left believes unequal outcomes are necessarily a sign of structual inequality. I don't think this is necessarily the case. I prefer the mixed approach: partially personal, partially societal. You are affected by society, sure, but for most cases, you can choose how to react.
I realize that your views are well reasoned and not overly simplistic. So just should clarify that my criticisms are not directed at you.
At face value, it's a reasonable sounding viewpoint that people are responsible for their actions and so long as they theoretically have the same opportunities then no one but themselves can be blamed when outcomes are unequal given equal opportunity. But realistically, it isn't that simple. Sometimes the outcomes are predictable based on the situations, and expecting people to have the fortitude to overcome them and assigning responsibility/blame on individuals when they fail, becomes unproductive. The goal should be helping people succeed in my view. If people are having trouble, whether it is due to their shortcomings, or external factors, should mostly be a matter that affects how we try to help. I.e., it's a matter of distinguishing/clarifying the difference between blame and cause, and addressing issues through causal analysis rather than assigning blame.
Last edited: