What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around frustrations with current documentary programming, particularly criticizing the History Channel's focus on sensational topics like time travel conspiracies instead of real historical content. Participants express disappointment over National Geographic's sale to Fox, fearing a decline in quality programming. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including humorous anecdotes about everyday life, such as a malfunctioning kitchen fan discovered to be blocked by installation instructions. There are also discussions about the challenges of understanding various dialects in Belgium, the complexities of language, and personal experiences with weather and housing in California. Members share their thoughts on food, including a peculiar dish of zucchini pancakes served with strawberry yogurt, and delve into mathematical concepts related to sandwich cutting and the properties of numbers. The thread captures a blend of serious commentary and lighthearted banter, reflecting a diverse range of interests and perspectives among participants.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #8,302
Just met someone , the type of " Glass in 99.9% empty". Wants to talk to me each time he sees me. I need a long nap afterwards.
 
  • #8,303
WWGD said:
Just met someone , the type of " Glass in 99.9% empty". Wants to talk to me each time he sees me. I need a long nap afterwards.
Save time and take it during.

I would quote Douglas Adams by what he said about how he invented Marvin the paranoid android but you haven't read him.
 
  • #8,304
Interesting game. Whenever the ball is in the end zone, it is an interception. End of 3rd quarter: 0-3. And they say soccer is boring for its lack of goals.
 
  • #8,305
Strange. Microwave functions , swivel rotates, but food does not get warmed up. Just charged my phone in the same outlet. Edit: Someone seriously suggested I test the diodes. But I first need to move the spectrometer out if the way. Do they think I have a lab at home?
 
Last edited:
  • #8,307
I can imagine someone who's doing their math thesis issuing all math challenges to get free research towards their degree.
 
  • #8,308
A fun thing to think about is, why does water fall out of an upside-down bucket, given that atmospheric pressure (##\times## interface area) pushing up on it from below is much, much larger than the weight of the water...
 
  • #8,309
Or if people use refrigerators in Siberia in Winter. Do they use them to warm up food?
 
  • Like
Likes AlexCaledin
  • #8,310
ergospherical said:
A fun thing to think about is, why does water fall out of an upside-down bucket, given that atmospheric pressure (##\times## interface area) pushing up on it from below is much, much larger than the weight of the water...
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,311
Nice, yes. The question is what exactly results in the instability of the air-water interface...
 
  • #8,312
ergospherical said:
Nice, yes. The question is what exactly results in the instability of the air-water interface...

There's some math for that! :smile: (Actually, it's physics, but Brady Haran put this in the Numberphile series rather than the Sixty Symbols.)

 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,313
How long can chicken be left unrefrigerated? I've cooked a little chicken/rice thing and need it to survive in a tupperware for about 14 or so hours in my bag... is that unreasonably long?
 
  • #8,314
ergospherical said:
How long can chicken be left unrefrigerated? I've cooked a little chicken/rice thing and need it to survive in a tupperware for about 14 or so hours in my bag... is that unreasonably long?
That sounds like a long time. I think general advice is no more than 1-2 hours. Personally, I wouldn't try your scenario.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,315
Yeah this sucks, I'll just make a sandwich or something.
 
  • #8,316
ergospherical said:
How long can chicken be left unrefrigerated? I've cooked a little chicken/rice thing and need it to survive in a tupperware for about 14 or so hours in my bag... is that unreasonably long?
Once it has been heated the usual suspects (salmonella) are destroyed. If you wrap it in or simply add a paper towel for the moisture, then I see no problem. I would eat it. However, the only chapter I remember from my English book at school was: "I have the stomach of an ox."

Maybe the window ledge is a good alternative to a refridgerator. Should be could enough in the UK at the moment.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,317
ergospherical said:
Yeah this sucks, I'll just make a sandwich or something.
How about using a Thermos?
 
  • #8,318
WWGD said:
How about using a Thermos?
Please elaborate... 🧐
 
  • #8,319
ergospherical said:
Please elaborate... 🧐
Screen Shot 2021-11-20 at 4.09.00 PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical and WWGD
  • #8,320
I ate (and eat) a day-old raw ground beef and never had problems. And a cooked meal will remain eatable within a day.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #8,321
Freeze it first?
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27
  • #8,322
BillTre said:

Oh alright, I thought he was talking about the flasks you fill with hot chocolate and other warm beverages. Couldn't quite figure out how I was going to force the chicken through the nozzle. :oldconfused:
 
  • #8,323
kyphysics said:
For me, it was a price/quality thing.

I just didn't find Blu-rays worth it over DVDs for the price/quality difference.

I'm curious, though, why some people still buy and collect records. Is there a unique sound they like from them? Are they like collectible "antiques" that may have future rare art-like value? etc.
I like that they are tactile.
 
  • #8,324
ergospherical said:
Oh alright, I thought he was talking about the flasks you fill with hot chocolate and other warm beverages. Couldn't quite figure out how I was going to force the chicken through the nozzle. :oldconfused:
Many have a removable cap that you unscrew by moving it counterclockwise.
 
  • #8,325
A freezer bag with one or two freezer packs (flat plastic bottle with water inside placed in a freezer beforehand to freeze) should refrigerate your food for several hours.
 
  • #8,326
I thought this was funny; a 3D printed, meat-free steak endorsed by (legendary) chef Marco Pierre White
https://www.veganfoodandliving.com/news/marco-pierre-white-to-sell-3d-printed-vegan-steak/

Has anybody ever considered a vegetarian/vegan diet, either temporarily or more long term? Do the sustainability/health (?)/animal-welfare aspects outweigh the lack of variety (i.e. more difficult to obtain required nutrients, protein, etc.) and/or enjoyment of eating meat?

Surely it isn't long now until meat-alternatives become indistinguishable from real meat (for all practical purposes). Will be interesting to observe how diets shift in the next 50-100 years; maybe we will all be eating insects by then. Food for thought!
 
  • #8,327
ergospherical said:
I thought this was funny; a 3D printed, meat-free steak endorsed by (legendary) chef Marco Pierre White
https://www.veganfoodandliving.com/news/marco-pierre-white-to-sell-3d-printed-vegan-steak/

Has anybody ever considered a vegetarian/vegan diet, either temporarily or more long term? Do the sustainability/health (?)/animal-welfare aspects outweigh the lack of variety (i.e. more difficult to obtain required nutrients, protein, etc.) and/or enjoyment of eating meat?

Surely it isn't long now until meat-alternatives become indistinguishable from real meat (for all practical purposes). Will be interesting to observe how diets shift in the next 50-100 years; maybe we will all be eating insects by then. Food for thought!
As I understand it, vegan diets are not necessarily any more sustainable nor cruelty-free. Cutting down forests to grow crops destroys habitats for some animals. Pesticides and fertilizers ; tractors and combines kill animals as well. Cattle is ( ideally) fed in lands that do not serve agricultural nor other purposes. But my research on this is cursory so I cannot stand bt it 100%. As with just about everything else, issue has become politicized and it's difficult to tell what's what at times.
 
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes BillTre and pbuk
  • #8,328
Although I’m most definitely not a vegetarian, it’s hard to deny that meat consumption is vastly more unsustainable both in terms of land requirements, deforestation (e.g. cattle ranching), resource/energy requirements and emissions. Although you do have a point about pesticides!

Personally I don’t think I’d be prepared to switch to a vegetarian diet, but meat alternatives might make that more attractive in years to come. And these sorts of innovations will be all the more important with projected future population growth / rising global standard of living.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk
  • #8,329
WWGD said:
As I understand it, vegan diets are not necessarily any more sustainable nor cruelty-free. Cutting down forests to grow crops destroys habitats for some animals. Pesticides and fertilizers ; tractors and combines kill animals as well. Cattle is ( ideally) fed in lands that do not serve agricultural nor other purposes. But my research on this is cursory so I cannot stand bt it 100%. As with just about everything else, issue has become politicized and it's difficult to tell what's what at times.
I welcome rebuttals with specifics.
 
  • #8,330
I lived in a house with vegetarians for a couple of years.
While I found the diet different, if you are doing it with someone who knows vegetarian cuisine, it doesn't have to be boring or taste bad. Another reason to do this with a knowledgeable person is to avoid nutritional problems due to some foods lacking certain nutrients. Everything will easier if you doing it with someone experienced.

Although I like beef, cattle are not a good use of land and resources for the amount of food produced.

I doubt that 3D printed food or vegie meats will be cheaper than the real thing very soon. IIts pretty easy to grow and slaughter an animal. The animal does most of the work.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical and WWGD
  • #8,331
It is the water, and crop consumption plus the methane that ruins the balance. Mealworms are an alternative. But as long as the US, India, and China run on coal, and our global transport systems all rely heavily on oil, I see no need to change my own behavior: knock its horns, wipe its aXX and throw it on the plate.

It is like demanding from a fly to reduce its sugar consumption in order to reduce global sugar consumption.
 
  • #8,332
fresh_42 said:
Mealworms are an alternative.
Any non-warm blooded animal will make better use of turning environmental resources into food than a warm blooded one (like mammals, such as cow, pigs, sheep).
A warm blooded animal will use about 10x the food of a cold blooded one because it uses energy to maintain a high body temperature.
At least some insects have fatty acids that are better for you also.
 
  • #8,333
There are still issues on the availability of arable land . Is there enough arable land in most parts of the world to provide a vegetarian/vegan diet for all? Certainly not in the middle east and most of Asia outside the South ( India, Bangladesh , mostly) How about those countries that have seasons so that you cannot grow crops all year?
Edit: It may be just me, but I have a psychological need to eat meat during winters. Notice vegetarian countries are those with no winters. A veg diet fits their climate and availability of arable land.
 
Last edited:
  • #8,334
WWGD said:
There are still issues on the availability of arable land . Is there enough arable land in most parts of the world to provide a vegetarian/vegan diet for all? Certainly not in the middle east and most of Asia outside the South ( India, Bangladesh , mostly) How about those countries that have seasons so that you cannot grow crops all year?
Would be interesting to see a map where Chinese investors have bought land since 2,000. I guess such a map is closer to a correct answer than any we can give.

Your calculation lacks evidence. The top 4 cattle producers are also the top 4 soybean producers. And if you can grow soybeans, you can also grow lupine.
 
  • #8,335
Bought some "veggie burgers" (the large print on the box), turns out they were "100% vegan" (the fine print)... tasted like what I imagine used motor oil tastes like. Unpleasant.
 
  • #8,336
hmmm27 said:
Bought some "veggie burgers" (the large print on the box), turns out they were "100% vegan" (the fine print)... tasted like what I imagine used motor oil tastes like. Unpleasant.
Better than mine: like orange juice after brushing my teeth. I'll skip and leave it for those who know: Indian chefs.
 
  • #8,337
This page has some interesting statistics and analysis:
https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
In particular, they note that beef, mutton and dairy require significantly more cropland than poultry and fish; so perhaps it's not necessary to stop eating all meat! :oldbiggrin:
fresh_42 said:
It is the water, and crop consumption plus the methane that ruins the balance. Mealworms are an alternative. But as long as the US, India, and China run on coal, and our global transport systems all rely heavily on oil, I see no need to change my own behavior: knock its horns, wipe its aXX and throw it on the plate.

It is like demanding from a fly to reduce its sugar consumption in order to reduce global sugar consumption.
Exactly, yes! It's hard for me to convince myself that any change I make to my individual lifestyle will cause anything but an utterly negligible benefit to the environment. Moreover, it's fairly well documented that, for example, energy companies promote rhetoric about "individual action" to divert public attention away from their own comparatively hugely destructive behaviours, e.g. https://www.vox.com/22429551/climate-change-crisis-exxonmobil-harvard-study.

On the flip-side, vegetarianism/veganism has become fairly trendy (at least in some parts of the UK...), with about half a million new vegans last year. That's not an insignificant change!
 
  • #8,338
ergospherical said:
This page has some interesting statistics and analysis:
https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
In particular, they note that beef, mutton and dairy require significantly more cropland than poultry and fish; so perhaps it's not necessary to stop eating all meat! :oldbiggrin:

Exactly, yes! It's hard for me to convince myself that any change I make to my individual lifestyle will cause anything but an utterly negligible benefit to the environment. Moreover, it's fairly well documented that, for example, energy companies promote rhetoric about "individual action" to divert public attention away from their own comparatively hugely destructive behaviours, e.g. https://www.vox.com/22429551/climate-change-crisis-exxonmobil-harvard-study.

On the flip-side, vegetarianism/veganism has become fairly trendy (at least in some parts of the UK...), with about half a million new vegans last year. That's not an insignificant change!
The thing is that , at least in theory, cattle is made to graze in the types of lands that do not serve much of other purposes. In that sense they do not, or at least should not, take much of any crop land.
Edit: One may reframe the issue: What better use can be given to lands currently used for grazing? These are, in theory, not usable for other purposes.
 
Last edited:
  • #8,339
ergospherical said:
On the flip-side, vegetarianism/veganism has become fairly trendy (at least in some parts of the UK...), with about half a million new vegans last year. That's not an insignificant change!
Same here. But that only translates to me as "buy less and better meat". We have had such veggie patties for long
Hirse_Bratlinge_Rezeptbild_Produkt.jpg
and they don't taste bad. I also eat a lot of beans and lens. And I am generally no friend of any sort of fanatism. We definitely could eat less meat, but that does not mean any meat.

WWGD said:
The thing is that , at least in theory, cattle is made to graze in the types of lands that do not serve much of other purposes. In that sense they do not, or at least should not, take much of any crop land.
Sorry, but this is wishful thinking (see my argument in post #8334). Cattle eat grass, and our main crops are all grass.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,340
ergospherical said:
This page has some interesting statistics and analysis:
https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
In particular, they note that beef, mutton and dairy require significantly more cropland than poultry and fish; so perhaps it's not necessary to stop eating all meat! :oldbiggrin:

Exactly, yes! It's hard for me to convince myself that any change I make to my individual lifestyle will cause anything but an utterly negligible benefit to the environment. Moreover, it's fairly well documented that, for example, energy companies promote rhetoric about "individual action" to divert public attention away from their own comparatively hugely destructive behaviours, e.g. https://www.vox.com/22429551/climate-change-crisis-exxonmobil-harvard-study.

On the flip-side, vegetarianism/veganism has become fairly trendy (at least in some parts of the UK...), with about half a million new vegans last year. That's not an insignificant change!
Ok, good points, it seems I overstated my case.
 
  • #8,341
fresh_42 said:
Would be interesting to see a map where Chinese investors have bought land since 2,000. I guess such a map is closer to a correct answer than any we can give.

Your calculation lacks evidence. The top 4 cattle producers are also the top 4 soybean producers. And if you can grow soybeans, you can also grow lupine.
It does not imply that both are grown in the same soils. Ergosphericals source even states non-flat terrains and some pastures are not productive towards agriculture. Then you can require only those lands be used for cattle. And the main issue is with beef.
 
  • #8,342
WWGD said:
It does not imply that both are grown in the same soils.
Sure, but you converse the reasoning. Cattle and soybeans are grown on different grounds, of course. But that does not mean that it has to be the case. Again, grass is grass, and rice, corn, and cereals are all grass. And again, the top 4 countries in cattle production are the same as the top 4 in soybeans production. Doesn't sound exclusively to me.

It is by far more ecologically stupid to grow almonds in California.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical and BillTre
  • #8,343
fresh_42 said:
Sure, but you converse the reasoning. Cattle and soybeans are grown on different grounds, of course. But that does not mean that it has to be the case. Again, grass is grass, and rice, corn, and cereals are all grass. And again, the top 4 countries in cattle production are the same as the top 4 in soybeans production. Doesn't sound exclusively to me.

It is by far more ecologically stupid to grow almonds in California.
I agree with the California part. Developing an agricultural industry in what's essentially a desert seems like lunacy. I am being something of a devil's advocate here in order to help flesh out the arguments; though maybe possibly just for myself. And I urge caution in making these changes. I don't know of any culture over history that was fully vegan . Why not, if Veganism is superior in so many ways? And just considering that all countries at the top of life expectancy at birth are omnivorous, while vegetarian ones are further down on the list. Surely, there are confounding variables to consider here , but it seems food for thought. My body just seems to ask me specifically for meat. It may just be habit, maybe not. I'm just urging caution. Change is neither good not bad on its own.
Edit: Just to be clear, I don't claim to be offering conclusive counters to Ergosphericals and others' valid points. Just using these points to urge caution.
 
Last edited:
  • #8,344
WWGD said:
I don't know of any culture over history that was fully vegan
WWGD said:
vegetarian ones are further down on the list
You seem to have contradicted yourself.
 
  • #8,345
BillTre said:
You seem to have contradicted yourself.
Ok, India today is largely vegetarian. I don't know if it always has been. Similar for Bangladesh. Surely the fact that life expectancy at birth is comparatively low is food for thought.
 
  • #8,346
My overall point is that, despite all legitimate issues today, quality of life by just-about every measure has been improving within the status quo. Including in areas related to health and nutrition.
main-qimg-5ffc1b7baa1d0f3252effefb8760b642.jpeg

Of course, that doesn't imply no changes should be made, just to think we were largely doing a good amount right up till now.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,347
WWGD said:
And just considering that all countries at the top of life expectancy at birth are omnivorous, while vegetarian ones are further down on the list. Surely, there are confounding variables to consider here , but it seems food for thought.
A factor to consider is that meat is relatively expensive, so generally as the affluence of a society increases so does meat consumption; we've seen an increased appetite for the "Western-style diet" in emerging economies like China1, for example.

1 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017...roblem-and-the-western-diet-could-be-to-blame
 
Last edited:
  • #8,348
I tried
ergospherical said:
A factor to consider is that meat is relatively expensive, so generally as the affluence of a society increases so does meat consumption; we've seen an increased appetite for the "Western-style diet" in emerging economies like China1, for example.

1 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017...roblem-and-the-western-diet-could-be-to-blame
I tried the veg diet for a while and I just didn't feel good. Same for my brother and some friends. I need to be able to work and need to have the energy for it.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #8,349
WWGD said:
I tried the veg diet for a while and I just didn't feel good. Same for my brother and some friends. I need to be able to work and need to have the energy for it.

I believe this is common (although I haven't tried myself, so I wouldn't know from personal experience). Perhaps it is due to deficiencies in nutrients, e.g. vitamin B12 and/or iron.

I also recall reading a little while back about a study which suggested veganism is correlated with higher depression rates compared to meat-eating 1. The direction of causation is not clear (i.e. are people with symptoms of depression more likely to become vegan, or vice versa?).

1 https://www.businessinsider.com/veg...on-anxiety-than-meat-eaters-2021-10?r=US&IR=T
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and WWGD
  • #8,350
Found some pretty old SQL Server files (.sql) containing system queries to map logins to users and roles. Wonder if they're worth much.
 

Similar threads

35
Replies
2K
Views
52K
Replies
3K
Views
155K
Replies
2K
Views
167K
Replies
4K
Views
230K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top