What is the optimal lower limit for solving an integral word problem?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal lower limit for solving an integral word problem involving the volume of a solid formed by revolving a curve around the x-axis. The intersection point of the curves is identified as (1.10, 2.78), and the lower limit is clarified to be 0, as the area is bounded by the y-axis and the intersection point. The method of integration is discussed, with a preference for using the cross-section or disk method, which requires x-coordinates as limits of integration. The conversation also highlights the importance of correctly applying the washer method for volume calculations and ensuring that the area under the curve is accurately accounted for. Overall, the integration limits and methods are crucial for solving the volume problem effectively.
niravana21
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the problem:
WordProblem19.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution


I found the intersection point to be (1.10,2.78). Now I don't know what to use for the lower limit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We are revolving the curve around the x axis. Since the area of R is limited by the y-axis, this means our limits of integration will be the x-coordinate where the two graphs intersect the y-axis and the point where they intersect each other.

What method of finding volume are you using? Cross sections or cylindrical shell? If using cross sections this will be a dx problem; if using the shell method this will be a dy problem. For this problem I would use the cross section/disk method and thus use x-coordinates as limits of integration. For a, this will be a washer.
 
Ya the upper limit is the point of intersection but what do you mean by when the graphs interse t the y axis? You can't have 3 limits?

Edit: so from 0 to 1.10?
 
It is zero--since we are bounded by the y-axis and the intersection, our limits of integration are 0,1.10.

When we find the volume we are going to add cross sections of the curve from 0 until we reach 1.10. Think of a layer cake--the bottom is zero and the top is the intersection of the curve. Turn it sideways and let the axis down the middle be the x-axis, and that is what we are doing.
 
Last edited:
And what about the second part?
 
We'll let f(x)=4-x2 and g(x)=1+2sin(x)
Use the same limits of integration, but a different cross section. The area of a square is A=s2. In this case s=f(x)-g(x), f(x)>g(x) on the interval of the limits of integration. Take Sab[f(x)-g(x)]2dx.

For a, remember to treat it as a washer. V=pi*Sab[f(x)]2-[g(x)]2dx.
 
just a general question, for both parts if I use the limits 0 to 1.10, won't that also include the area under the curve for 1+2sin(x) curve until x=1.10?
 
If you treat it as a washer for a, you will have subtracted the volume of 1+2sin(x). For part b, you also subtract the area of 1+2sin(x). 4-x2 includes the area/volume resulting from 1+2sin(x), so by subtracting it we get the area of R.

Earlier I accidently used 2.78 instead of 1.10...fixed my above post.
 
thank you very much for all the help you have provided.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K