What is the phase accumulation of reflected wave?

  • Context: Archived 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sapz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phase accumulation of a reflected wave in a multi-area medium. The original wave Y1, described by the equation Y_1(x,t) = Ae^{i(wt-k_1x)}, partially transmits into Area 2 and reflects back into Area 1. The participant queries whether the phase of the returning wave Y4 should be represented as Y_4(x,t) = Be^{i(wt+k_1x+\phi)} with φ = 2Dk_2 or φ = -2Dk_2, highlighting the importance of understanding wave behavior at boundaries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and wave equations
  • Familiarity with wave number (k) and phase shift concepts
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in wave propagation
  • Basic principles of reflectivity and transmittance coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of boundary conditions on wave reflection and transmission
  • Learn about phase shifts in wave mechanics, particularly at boundaries
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of wave equations in multi-area media
  • Investigate acoustic wave behavior and its applications in different mediums
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as engineers working with acoustic waves and boundary interactions.

sapz
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



(See picture)
We have 3 areas in which a wave can move.

The wave Y1 starts at area 1 and goes towards Border 1, some part of it is passed to Area 2.
That part goes towards Border 2, and some part of it is reflected back into Area 2.
That part moves towards Border 1, and some of it passes to Area 1.

I'm interested in that last part that returned to Area 1, which is Y4.
What is its Phase? It would seem that the wave accumulated phase when it was in Area 2, so should it be 2D * k2? (wave number times the distance in that area)?

If the original wave was Y_1(x,t) = Ae^{i(wt-k_1x)}, would Y4 be Y_4(x,t) = Be^{i(wt+k_1x+\phi)}, where \phi = 2Dk_2?
Or should it be \phi = -2Dk_2?

(A and B are some amplitudes we can relate through reflectivity and transmittance coefficients)
 

Attachments

  • qstwaves2.png
    qstwaves2.png
    24 KB · Views: 1,078
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nether
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K