What Is the Physical Meaning of Density of States in Solid State Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of states (DOS) in solid-state physics quantifies the number of electronic states at a specific energy level, often derived from Kohn-Sham orbitals in Density Functional Theory (DFT). The discussion highlights the distinction between total DOS and projected DOS, where the latter focuses on contributions from specific atomic orbitals, such as s, p, d, and f. Additionally, the spectral function serves as a many-body generalization of DOS, providing insights into interactions that may not be captured by traditional DOS calculations. The relationship between DOS and Green's functions is also emphasized, particularly in defining local density of states for specific orbitals or spatial points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kohn-Sham orbitals in DFT
  • Familiarity with density functional theory (DFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of many-body physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of density of states using Kohn-Sham orbitals in DFT
  • Explore the spectral function and its applications in many-body systems
  • Learn about the differences between total DOS and projected DOS in solid-state systems
  • Investigate the role of Green's functions in defining local density of states
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers in solid-state physics seeking to deepen their understanding of electronic properties and density of states in various materials.

askhetan
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
While studying about k-points, etc. I came across the terms density of states. What is it's physical meaning. research papers often have DOS graphs in which they segregate s, p, d contributions and talk about fermi level etc. Is this DOS the same as the kohn-sham orbitals that are solved for in standard DFT?.. because actually for many body systems there should be no orbitals and stuff

Also, what is the difference between total DOS and projected DOS ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well of course i googled it and as usual the answers were either completely drenched with maths or were incomprehensible. here at PF, I am hoping to people who can give me the physical insight without me having to search the entire net.
 
The density of states tells you how many states exist at a certain energy level. This can be calculated, and often is, from the Kohn-Sham orbitals in DFT. This can be compared to photoemission experiments, for occupied states. Since the DOS is calculated from the energy levels of each individual state, you can decompose the states into s,p,d,f and only factor in the (say) d contribution of states to get a partial DOS for d orbitals.

There is a many-body generalization of the density of states called the spectral function. This can be obtained from models which take interactions into account and often agrees better with experimental spectra than the DOS.
 
I am quite sure there is a model independent definition e.g. in terms of Greens functions.
 
Yes, that's the spectral function A(w) = -1/pi * I am G(w)
In the non-interacting case you can show that it's exactly equal to the density of states.
 
Additionally to the spectral function/density of states: As the Green's function comes with orbital labels, one can also define a local density of states (e.g., for certain k or certain orbitals or even certain points in space). For example, the (hole) Green's function for a wave function |\Psi\rangle is essentially
g_{rs}(\Delta t) = \langle\Psi| c^\dagger_r \exp(-i H\cdot \Delta t/\hbar)\,c_s |\Psi\rangle,
(take or give some factors of i/-1/pi/2) where the operator in the middle is time propagation operator (\exp(\Delta t \cdot \partial_t)), and the creation/annihilation operators a refer to some arbitrary one-particle basis set (g_{rs}(t) is thus the same as the corresponding density matrix at t=0 [not frequency = 0]). The frequency-dependent Green's function is obtained by Fourier-transforming Δt.

Now, you can, if you want, just form the Green's function, say, "g_{rs}(w)" with r and s both restricted to s or p or d orbitals (or bloch waves formed from them). Then you get a density of states for those states only. Or you can put in different operators than the creation/destruction operators (say, density at a certain orbital, or dipole moment operators) to get different effects.

If you are dealing with one-particle wave functions (like Kohn-Sham or Hartree-Fock), then all such transformations can actually be done in practice, at the one-particle level. This is where all those colorful pictures of DOS from DFT programs come from. However, in principle one *can* define analogs of those pictures for correlated theories, too. Evaluating them from first principles, of course, is a different question.
 
Also, what is the difference between total DOS and projected DOS ?


By projected DOS one means the contribution of a certain element in a compound to the total density of states. One can do this by defining a radius for each atom and the states that fall within this radius are assigned to that particular atom.

In addition to what is posted above I'd like to add that simply the density of states for an "aggregate" of atoms is equivalent to the discrete shells of a single atom [recall the simple picture of H atom in elementary chemistry]. when atoms "aggregate" together these discrete shells merge and form continuous energy bands.
 
One more thing. In DFT parlance , when DOS is mentioned it implies Kohn-Sham DOS. But the problem is people tend to forget this and even more tend to forget that even with the exact density functional, the Kohn-Sham DOS will remain different from the "true" DOS.
 
  • #10
cgk defined a greens function matrix g_rs. There should be a set of orbitals which diagonalizes this matrix (and I think I even once knew their names). Especially for these orbitals, the interpretation as a DOS should be especially meaningful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K