DFT: Investigating Change in States at Surfaces and Interfaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Density Functional Theory (DFT) to investigate changes in electronic states at surfaces and interfaces. The Kohn-Sham eigenvalues are critical for constructing the band structure and density of states (DOS), with a specific emphasis on aligning the vacuum level as a reference point for both surface and interface calculations. The author seeks to understand how to align eigenvalues for interface calculations, particularly when lacking an absolute energy reference. The conclusion drawn is that while eigenvalues are determined up to a constant, they can still be compared if the Fermi levels are aligned appropriately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Density Functional Theory (DFT)
  • Familiarity with Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and their role in band structure
  • Knowledge of vacuum level alignment in electronic structure calculations
  • Concept of density of states (DOS) in solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for aligning vacuum levels in DFT calculations
  • Explore techniques for calculating surface resonances in DFT
  • Investigate the implications of Fermi level alignment in interface studies
  • Learn about the role of exchange-correlation potentials in DFT
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in condensed matter physics, materials science, and computational chemistry who are focused on electronic properties of surfaces and interfaces using DFT methodologies.

Arcturus82
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

In Density Functional Theory (DFT) the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues are used to construct the band structure and the density of states (DOS). For a 3D extended system the eigenvalues are determined up to a constant since there is no absolute energy reference, while for a 2D extended surface a well-defined energy reference exists (the vacuum level).

I now want to look at

a) Which states that changes (i.e. the energy range) when creating a surface from a bulk system (e.g. to find surface resonances).

b) Which states that changes when creating an interface from two free surfaces.

In order to investigate the change in states I have to have the same energy reference for both systems.

For a) I can for the surface system evaluate the electrostatic (and the exhange-correlation) potential and align my vacuum level with my DOS at the surface layer. Then if my slab is sufficiently thick I can also align the bulk DOS.

How can I proceed for case b) ? For each respective surface calculation I can relate the eigen values to the vacuum level, but for the interface calculation I run into to difficulties since I don't have an absolute reference. As far as I can see it the Fermi levels for the surfaces and the interface can't be aligned w.r.t. each other to due the lack of this absolute reference. Is my conclusion correct or can I still align them at the Fermi level? If the latter is valid, why is it so?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that as long as you don't shift your states so that the Fermi level is at zero then you will be able to properly compare them directly. The eigenvalues are determined up to an additive constant, but that constant will be present in your Hamiltonian. Your potential in either case is V(r) = \sum_i -Ze/r_i where i runs over the nuclear positions. Since you don't have an extra constant that is changed from one calculation to another both will give you energies relative to the same reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K