What is the physical meaning of the commutator of L^2 and x_i?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat1z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the computation of the commutator of L^2 with the components of the r-vector in quantum mechanics. The commutation relation [L_i, x_j] = i ħ ε_{ijk} x_k is established, leading to the conclusion that [L^2, x_j] = i ħ ε_{ijk} (L_i x_k + x_k L_i). The participants confirm that non-zero commutators indicate that the corresponding observables cannot be simultaneously measured, aligning with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The primary takeaway is that the value of the commutator itself does not provide additional physical meaning beyond indicating whether observables can be measured simultaneously.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators
  • Familiarity with commutation relations
  • Knowledge of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the construction of angular momentum eigenstates
  • Learn about simultaneous diagonalization of operators
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

mat1z
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Task: The task is to compute the commutator of L^2 with all components of the r-vector. It seems to be an unusual task for I was unable to find it in any book.

Known stuff: I know that [L_i,x_j]=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} x_k (\epsilon_{ijk} being the Levi-Civita symbol). Now I would go about as follows (summation implied):

My attempt: [L^2,x_j]=[L_iL_i,x_j]=L_i[L_i,x_j]+[L_i,x_j]L_i=i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} (L_i x_k + x_k L_i)

Question: Is this correct? Is there a physical meaning to this result other than that they do not commute (with the usual implications)?

Regards, Matti from Germany
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's correct.

When two operators commute their eigenvectors coincide. In quantum mechanics it means that the corresponding physical magnitudes can be measured simultaneously.
 
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...
 
mat1z said:
Alright, thanks for the reply.

So, does that mean that the only real information contained in commutators as such (and not their application, as in constructing angular momentum eigenstates) is in it being zero or not? It's clear to me that zero commutators imply instantaneous measurability but I thought maybe there was something to be seen from the "value" that the commutator takes...

Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).
 
jdwood983 said:
Not instantaneous measurements, but simultaneous diagonalization--you will be able to find eigenstates of both A and B if [A,B]=0.
Having a non-zero commutators means the observables cannot be simultaneously known (cf. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).

Sorry, simultaneous measurements is what I was trying to say, of course. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K