What is the physical significance of an electric field divergance of zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical significance of a zero divergence of an electric field, specifically in regions devoid of charge. Participants are examining the implications of the mathematical expression del.E=0 and its interpretations in different coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which del.E=0 indicates no charges and whether this implies a uniform electric field. There are discussions about the implications of coordinate systems on this interpretation and the nature of electric fields in infinitesimal volumes.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between electric field divergence and charge distribution. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which a zero divergence does not necessarily imply uniformity of the electric field.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the nuances of electric field behavior in relation to Gauss's law and the implications of varying electric fields within small volumes, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

Raven1512
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework problem, I'm going over some notes and seem to have a discrepancy. In a local region with no charge, del.E=0. Since the divergence is zero, there are no sources and sinks (ie charges).

In my notes I have;
"In cartesian co-ords, a solution of del.E=0 is a uniform Electric field."

Yet later in the notes I seem to have;
"del.E=0 does not imply a uniform electric field".

I'm assuming I've misheard something, but can't find anything in any of my textbooks on it. I can't see what difference changing the co-ordinate system should have on del.E.

It is that since del.E=O suggests no charges, the field CAN be uniform but doesn't have to be (and del.E at a small point in a uniform field must be zero since on a small scale the net flux in and out of an infintesimally small volume are identical)? But on an infintesimaly small volume any E field through the volume will be uniform because on such a scale, all of the field lines will point in the same direction and hence on a small scale any del.E=0 result will be a uniform field since it contains no charge?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
del.E = 0

implies there is no charge inside the closed curve you are operating on.
aber there could be field inside the curve due to the charges present outside it.
the field doesn't necessarily have to be a uniform field.
 
Raven1512 said:
It is that since del.E=O suggests no charges, the field CAN be uniform but doesn't have to be
That's it.

But... if [itex]\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{E}[/itex] is zero everywhere, at all points in space, all the way out to infinity, then you could conclude that there are no charges anywhere, and that the electric field is uniform (zero, in fact, given the usual boundary conditions).
 
Raven1512 said:
It is that since del.E=O suggests no charges, the field CAN be uniform but doesn't have to be (and del.E at a small point in a uniform field must be zero since on a small scale the net flux in and out of an infintesimally small volume are identical)?
Yes.

But on an infintesimaly small volume any E field through the volume will be uniform because on such a scale, all of the field lines will point in the same direction and hence on a small scale any del.E=0 result will be a uniform field since it contains no charge?
No. Think of applying the integral formulation of Gauss's law to an infinitesimal cube of size dx by dy by dz. Looking at the x-component of E, you can calculate the flux through two sides of this cube:

[tex]d\Phi_x = E_x(x+dx,y,z)dydz - E_x(x,y,z)_xdydz = \frac{\partial E_x}{\partial x}dxdydz[/tex]

Note that this takes into account that E may vary with x. Doing the same thing for the y and z directions, you find the total flux through the cube is

[tex]d\Phi = (\frac{\partial E_x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial E_y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial E_z}{\partial z})dxdydz[/tex]

If there is no charge in the volume, you get [itex]\nabla\cdot \vec{E}=0[/itex] even though the field is not necessarily uniform.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K