What Is the Potential of an Uncharged Conductor Near a Charged Conductor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential of an uncharged conductor placed near a positively charged conductor. It concludes that the potential of the uncharged conductor is less than that of the charged conductor but greater than the potential at infinity, confirming option A as the correct answer. The reasoning involves the induction of negative charge on the uncharged conductor's near side and the behavior of electric fields and potentials in proximity to charged bodies. The potential at infinity is established as zero, while the induced potential remains positive due to the influence of the charged conductor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Knowledge of potential difference and charge induction
  • Familiarity with the concept of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium
  • Basic principles of spherical capacitors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electrostatic induction in conductors
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields around point charges
  • Explore the concept of electric potential and its calculation
  • Investigate the properties of spherical capacitors and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, educators teaching electric potential concepts, and anyone interested in the behavior of conductors in electric fields.

Tanishq Nandan
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Consider a finite,uncharged,insulated conductor placed near a finite positively charged conductor.The uncharged body must have a potential
A)less than the charged conductor and more than at infinity
B)more than the charged conductor and less than at infinity
C)more than the charged conductor and more than at infinity
D)less than the charged conductor and less than at infinity

Homework Equations



None,theoretical question..

The Attempt at a Solution


I just took a case of two spherical capacitors,first one being uncharged and second one charged (say positively charged).If the second sphere is brought near the first one,it induces a negative charge on one side of the sphere and a corresponding positive charge on the other side of the sphere.The charge distribution may not be uniform,but is is such that the field inside the conductor becomes zero.
Now,if we calculate the potential of the sphere,it will still turn out to be zero,right?
(K × total charge/common distance)...and the potential at infinity is zero as well..hence,my problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanishq Nandan said:

Homework Statement


Consider a finite,uncharged,insulated conductor placed near a finite positively charged conductor.The uncharged body must have a potential
A)less than the charged conductor and more than at infinity
B)more than the charged conductor and less than at infinity
C)more than the charged conductor and more than at infinity
D)less than the charged conductor and less than at infinity

Homework Equations



None,theoretical question..

The Attempt at a Solution


I just took a case of two spherical capacitors,first one being uncharged and second one charged (say positively charged).If the second sphere is brought near the first one,it induces a negative charge on one side of the sphere and a corresponding positive charge on the other side of the sphere.The charge distribution may not be uniform,but is is such that the field inside the conductor becomes zero.
Now,if we calculate the potential of the sphere,it will still turn out to be zero,right?
(K × total charge/common distance)...and the potential at infinity is zero as well..hence,my problem.
Zero field means constant potential, not necessarily zero. What do you know about the potential on a metal body?
Think how the electric field and potential vary far from the two spheres. Is the potential positive, can it increase with distance somewhere?
 
Well,yeah,once the distance from the centre is greater than the radius,it acts as a point charge,and the field decreases with distance
 
Tanishq Nandan said:
Well,yeah,once the distance from the centre is greater than the radius,it acts as a point charge,and the field decreases with distance
Yes, near the conductors, the field is distorted, but far away, it is like the one of a point charge.
The arrows show the field lines in the figure. What do you think, is the uncharged (gray ) body at positive or negative potential with respect to infinity? Is it at lower or higher potential than the positively charged body?

upload_2017-7-5_18-43-18.png
 
Ok,got it..
For the gray body,the charged conductor will act as a point charge and impart some potential to it..
KQ/d which is going to be lesser than KQ/R (R is radius of charged conductor),
as R is obviously smaller than d...but,the potential is still positive,so it's greater than the potential at infinity..
That would mean option A.
Correct??
 
Tanishq Nandan said:
Ok,got it..
For the gray body,the charged conductor will act as a point charge and impart some potential to it..
KQ/d which is going to be lesser than KQ/R (R is radius of charged conductor),
as R is obviously smaller than d...but,the potential is still positive,so it's greater than the potential at infinity..
That would mean option A.
Correct??
Looks good.
The potential decreases in the direction of the electric field, so it is higher at finite length than at infinity.
The positively charged body induces some negative charge on the closer surface of the neutral body, and some field lines connect some positive charge with the negative charges between the bodies; so the potential decreases from the charged body to the neutral one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanishq Nandan

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
616
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K