What is the proof for the expectation value of a quantum system?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the expectation value of a quantum system, specifically focusing on the time derivative of the expectation value of \(x^2\) in quantum mechanics. The original poster attempts to derive the relationship involving the operators \(xp\) and \(px\) while working with a normalized wavefunction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the time derivative of the expectation value, questioning the validity of certain steps, such as treating \(x^2\) as a time-dependent variable. There is also mention of using the Heisenberg representation as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to manipulate integrals and apply the Schrödinger equation, with some participants providing hints and guidance on alternative methods. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, and while some progress has been made, there is no explicit consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is part of a homework assignment, which may impose constraints on the methods and knowledge expected to be utilized. There is also a mention of the original poster's uncertainty regarding certain concepts, such as the Heisenberg representation.

Warr
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I am trying to show that

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}<x^2>=\frac{1}{m}(<xp>+<px>)[/tex]....(1)

With the wavefunction [tex]\Psi[/tex] being both normalized to unity and square integrable

Here is what I tried...

[tex]<xp> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*xp{\Psi}dx[/tex]


[tex]<px> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*px{\Psi}dx=\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*\frac{\partial}{{\partial}x}(x{\Psi})dx=\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*({\Psi}+x\frac{{\partial}{\Psi}}{{\partial}x})dx=\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*{\Psi}dx+\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*x\frac{{\partial}{\Psi}}{{\partial}x}dx[/tex]

from here the first part in the addition reduces to [tex]\frac{\hbar}{i}[/tex] since the integral reduces to 1 for a normalized wavefunction. The second part is just the integral for <xp>, so I'll just reduce it to that for now...

[tex]<px>=\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*{\Psi}dx+\frac{\hbar}{i}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\Psi}^*x\frac{{\partial}{\Psi}}{{\partial}x}dx =\frac{\hbar}{i}+<xp>[/tex]

so now we have

[tex]\frac{1}{m}(<xp>+<px>) = \frac{\hbar}{im}+\frac{2}{m}<xp>[/tex]...(2)

Looking at the left side of of equation (1) now

[tex]\frac{\partial}{{\partial}t}<x^2>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}(\Psi^*x^2{\Psi})dx=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^2\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}(\Psi^*{\Psi})dx+\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Psi^*\frac{d}{dt}(x^2){\Psi}dx[/tex]

now.. I don't know if I can even do this: [tex]\frac{d}{dt}x^2=2x\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{2}{m}xp[/tex]

assuming I could, that reduces the second integral to [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Psi^*\frac{d}{dt}(x^2){\Psi}dx=\frac{2}{m}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Psi^*xp{\Psi}dx=\frac{2}{m}<xp>[/tex]

subbing into the LS and RS of equation (1) gives

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^2\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}(\Psi^*{\Psi})dx + \frac{2}{m}<xp> = \frac{\hbar}{im} + \frac{2}{m}<xp>[/tex]

the same terms on each side cancel leaving me to show

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^2\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}(\Psi^*{\Psi})dx = \frac{\hbar}{im}[/tex]

The inner derivative of this equation can be expanded to

[tex]\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}(\Psi^*{\Psi})=\Psi^*\frac{{\partial\Psi}}{{\partial}t}+\frac{{\partial}\Psi^*}{{\partial}t}\Psi[/tex]

From Shroedinger's eq'n we know

[tex]\frac{{\partial}\Psi}{{\partial}t}=\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\frac{{\partial}^2\Psi}{{\partial}x^2}-\frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi[/tex]

[tex]\frac{{\partial}\Psi^*}{{\partial}t}=-(\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\frac{{\partial}^2\Psi^*}{{\partial}x^2}-\frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi^*)[/tex]

we then find that

[tex]\Psi^*\frac{{\partial\Psi}}{{\partial}t}+\frac{{\partial}\Psi^*}{{\partial}t}\Psi=\frac{i\hbar}{2m}(\Psi^*\frac{{\partial^2\Psi}}{{\partial}x^2}-\frac{{\partial^2}\Psi^*}{{\partial}x^2}\Psi)=\frac{\partial}{{\partial}x}(\frac{i\hbar}{2m}(\Psi^*\frac{{\partial\Psi}}{{\partial}x}-\frac{{\partial}\Psi^*}{{\partial}x}\Psi))[/tex]

From here I don't know where I'm going..seems like kind of a dead end..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give you a hint. Work in the Heisenberg representation. No integrations, just operator equalities (surely, assuming a common dense domain for the operators and a specific form of the Hamiltonian).
 
I don't really know anything about 'Heisenberg representation'...this is homework too, so it would probably be pointless to figure out since we aren't expected to know it.
 
Last edited:
Warr said:
now.. I don't know if I can even do this: [tex]\frac{d}{dt}x^2=2x\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{2}{m}xp[/tex]

No, you can't; x doesn't depend on t, it's just an integration variable.

Start with
[tex]{\partial\over\partial t}\langle x^2\rangle=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[{\partial\Psi^*\over\partial t}x^2\Psi+\Psi^*x^2{\partial\Psi\over\partial t}\right]dx[/tex]
Then use the Schrödinger equation and it's complex conjugate. Then do some integrations by parts to try to get it to look like your integral expression for [tex]\langle(xp+px)\rangle[/tex]

Dexter is right that this problem is *much* easier in the Heisenberg representation.
 
Thanks, I got it to work out now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K