What is the proof for the property of taking the gradient of a function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ohlala191785
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the property of the gradient operation for differentiable functions. Specifically, it establishes that the gradient of a function raised to a power, expressed as ∇(u^n) = n*u^(n-1)*∇u, is valid. The participants clarify that the notation ∇(u^n) is correct, while the notation for the gradient of the gradient, ∇(∇u)^n, is not meaningful. The use of the chain rule for partial derivatives is emphasized as the appropriate method for this proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gradient vectors and their notation
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and the chain rule
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Concept of differentiable functions in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Explore proofs involving mathematical induction in calculus
  • Learn about the properties of gradient vectors in vector calculus
  • Investigate advanced topics in differentiable functions and their gradients
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and vector analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the properties of gradients in multivariable functions.

ohlala191785
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a and b are constants.

Operation: (∇(u))n = n*un-1*∇u

Homework Equations



The gradient vector of f is <∂f/∂x,∂f/∂y>, where f is a function of x and y (in other words f(x,y)).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried proof by induction, but I have a lot of gaps.

Base, n=1: ∇u = n*u0∇u. But what is u0 if u is a function?

Assume n = k: ∇uk = n*uk-1∇u

For k=k+1, ∇uk+1 = n*uk∇u.

Isn't proof by induction for sums though? I can't seem to identify the sum here.Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ohlala191785 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a and b are constants.

Operation: (∇(u))n = n*un-1*∇u

Homework Equations



The gradient vector of f is <∂f/∂x,∂f/∂y>, where f is a function of x and y (in other words f(x,y)).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried proof by induction, but I have a lot of gaps.

Base, n=1: ∇u = n*u0∇u. But what is u0 if u is a function?

Assume n = k: ∇uk = n*uk-1∇u

For k=k+1, ∇uk+1 = n*uk∇u.

Isn't proof by induction for sums though? I can't seem to identify the sum here.


Any help would be greatly appreciated!

You have got to mean ## \nabla (u^n)=n u^{n-1} \nabla u ##, ## (\nabla(u))^n ## doesn't mean anything. Just use the chain rule for partial derivatives.
 
Oh I see. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K