What is the proof of this theorem in linear algebra ?

Click For Summary
The theorem states that if V is a vector space with a basis of m vectors and there are n vectors in V where n is greater than m, then the n vectors are linearly dependent. The proof involves expressing each vector in terms of the basis vectors and showing that the resulting equations lead to a system with more unknowns than equations, allowing for a non-trivial solution. This implies that at least one of the coefficients must be non-zero, confirming the linear dependence of the n vectors. Various methods exist for proving this, including matrix row reduction and induction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the theorem's implications in linear algebra.
Maths Lover
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
hello, the theorem says :
let V be a vector space over the field K , let { v1 , v2 , ... , vm } be a basis of V over K
let {w1 , w2 , ... , wn} be elements of V and assume that n is bigger than m , then
{ w1 , w2 , ... , wn } are linearly dependent

the proof is written here but I didn't understand it well , I hope that you give me a simple proof :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, do you understand that saying "{v1, v2, ..., vm} is a basis of V" means that every vector in V can be written as a unique linear combination of those vectors? And, I assume you know that saying that "{w1, w2, ..., wn} are linearly dependent" means that there exist members of K, a1, a2, ... , an, not all 0, such that a1w1+ a2w2+ ... + anwn= 0.

To prove that, suppose a1w1+ a2w2+ ... + anwn= 0. Replace each wi with its expression as a linear combination of the basis vectors: wi= bi1v1+ bi2v2+ ...+ bimvm. The a1w1+ a2w2+ ...+ anwn= a1(b11v1+ b12v2+ ... b1nvn)+ a2(b21v1+ b22v2+ ...+ b2nvn)+ ...+ am(bn1v1+ bn2v2+ ...+ bmnvn)= (a1b11+ a2b12+ ...+ anbn1)v1+ (a1b12+ a2b22+ ... ambm2)v2+ ...+ (a1b1n+ a2b2n+ ... ambmn)vm= 0.

Because the {v1, v2, ..., vn} are a basis, they are independent and so we must have a1b11+ a2b12+ ...+ anbn1= 0, a1b12+ a2b22+ ... ambm2= 0, ..., a1b1n+ a2b2n+ ...+ ambmn= 0. That is m linear equations in the n "unknowns" a1, a2, ..., am. Because n> m, we can always solve for m of the unknowns in terms of the other n- m. Taking any of the am+1, am+2, ..., an to be non- zero show that the m vectors are dependent.
 
there are many proofs.

one concrete one is to put the vectors into a matrix and row reduce it until you see there are dependency solutions.

another is to use riemann's "exchange" lemma, often falsely attributed to steinitz.

i have given another in my math 4050 notes ion my webpage.

most proofs proceed by induction. you might try making your own.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K