What is the proof that S0_O(3,1) is connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The group S0_O(3,1) is defined as S0_O(3,1) = { a ∈ SO(3,1) | (ae_4, e_4) < 0 }. To demonstrate that this group is connected, one can utilize several established criteria: showing that any two elements can be joined by a C^k-path, proving it is not the disjoint union of two non-empty open sets, or confirming it is generated by a neighborhood of the identity matrix or by exp(𝔤). A potential approach includes demonstrating that S0_O(3,1) is the image of a known connected space under a continuous map.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the special orthogonal group SO(3,1)
  • Familiarity with topological concepts such as connectedness
  • Knowledge of Lie groups and their properties
  • Basic understanding of continuous mappings in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the special orthogonal group SO(3,1)
  • Study the definitions and implications of connectedness in topological spaces
  • Learn about Lie group generation and the exponential map exp(𝔤)
  • Explore examples of continuous mappings and their effects on connectedness
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and Lie groups, as well as students studying advanced algebraic structures and their properties.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
define the group
[itex]S0_O(3,1) = \{ a \in SO(3,1) | (ae_4,e_4) < 0 \}[/itex]
i need to show this group is connected

in my notes it says a group G is connected if it satisfies any of the following:
(i)any two elements of G can be joined by a [itex]C^k[/itex]-path in G
(ii) it is not the disjoint union of two non-empty open sets
(iii) it is generated by a neighbourhood of 1 (the identity matrix)
(iv) it is generated by [itex]exp \mathfrak{g}[/itex]

im not sure which one to try and prove or how to go about it really. can anybody offer some advice? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know enough about SO(3,1) to figure out the answer, but another potential way to show it connected is to show it's the image of a known-connected space under a continuous map.
 


bump.

ive got a feeling its going to be a proof by contradiction but that might be a whole load of rubbish.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
18K