What is the Proportionality of Electrostatic Potential at a Distance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrostatic potential generated by a configuration of charges at the vertices of a square. The original poster is trying to determine the proportionality of the electrostatic potential at a point far from the square, specifically in relation to the distance from the charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for electrostatic potential and expresses confusion regarding the correct proportionality among the given options. Some participants question the nature of the charge arrangement, considering it as a quadrupole.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem. One participant suggests that the correct answer is proportional to 1/r^3, while the original poster expresses uncertainty about their initial reasoning. There is no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working under the constraints of an objective type question with multiple-choice options, which may influence their reasoning process.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


(Objective type question)
Consider a square ABCD of side a, with charges +q, -q, +q, -q placed at the vertices, A, B, C, D in a clockwise manner. The electrostatic potential at some point located at distances r(r>>a) is proportional to?


Homework Equations



[tex]V =\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\sum_i \frac{q_i}{R_i}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



From the equation for the electrostatic potential is the obvious that V will be proportional to 1/r. I am a little confused by the options given to me...so just want to confirm.

Other options:
a] Constant
b] 1/r^2
c] 1/r^3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi reshma,it is the 1/r^3 which is the correct answer.Note that it is a quadrupole...You may wish to refer to Griffiths page 147.
 
Thanks a billion, neelakash! I knew something was fishy with my answer...I never thought of the quadrapole moment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K