What is the purpose of substitution in integration?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Substitution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the purpose of substitution in integration, specifically using the integral $$\int \frac{4}{x^2 + 4}$$ as a case study. Participants explore various substitution methods, including $$u = \frac{x}{2}$$ and $$x = 2\tan(\theta)$$, to simplify the integral. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing Pythagorean identities and how they can facilitate integration. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that proper substitution leads to a more manageable integral form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic integration techniques
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in calculus
  • Ability to differentiate and manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of trigonometric substitution in integrals
  • Learn about Pythagorean identities and their role in integration
  • Practice solving integrals using $$u$$-substitution
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, such as integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integration techniques, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of substitution methods in integral calculus.

shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have $$\int \frac{4}{x^2 + 4} $$

So I understand the first thing we would so is bring the constant out and do u substitution but what I don't understand is how we can make the substitution u = $$\frac{x}{2}$$ when there clearly is no $$\frac{x}{2}$$ in the problem. I also understand how to factor out a 4 in the denominator thus getting us this

$$\int \frac{1}{\frac{x^2}{4} + 1} $$

but then I don't understand how we can say u = $$\frac{x}{2}$$ then $$du = 1/2dx$$

when $$\frac{x}{2}$$ is no where in the problem..What am I missing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
... but then I don't understand how we can say u = $$\frac{x}{2}$$ then $$du = 1/2dx$$

when $$\frac{x}{2}$$ is no where in the problem..What am I missing

$\displaystyle \frac{x^2}{4} = \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^2$
 
I would instead use the substitution:

$$x=2\tan(\theta)$$

Then you may apply a useful Pythagorean identity...
 
MarkFL said:
I would instead use the substitution:

$$x=2\tan(\theta)$$

Then you may apply a useful Pythagorean identity...

I don't understand how. Can you show me?
 
shamieh said:
I don't understand how. Can you show me?

First, compute $dx$, and then make the substitution...what do you have now?
 
MarkFL said:
First, compute $dx$, and then make the substitution...what do you have now?

$$x = 2tan\theta$$
$$dx = 2sec^2\theta$$
 
shamieh said:
$$x = 2tan\theta$$
$$dx = 2sec^2\theta$$

Correct, now substitute for $x$ and $dx$ and what do you have?
 
$$\int \frac{4}{2tan^2\theta + 4} 2sec^2\theta$$
 
shamieh said:
$$\int \frac{4}{2tan^2\theta + 4} 2sec^2\theta$$

Not quite...you want:

$$\int\frac{4}{(2\tan(\theta))^2+4}2\sec^2(\theta)\,d\theta$$

Also, I didn't notice earlier that your computation of $dx$ did not include $d\theta$.

Now, can you simplify this?
 
  • #10
shamieh said:
$$\int \frac{4}{2tan^2\theta + 4} 2sec^2\theta$$
$$\frac{8}{2} \int \frac{sec^2\theta}{tan^2\theta + 4} \, d\theta$$
$$
u = tan^2\theta + 4$$
$$du = sec^2\theta \, d\theta$$ ?
 
  • #11
It seems you only squared the tan and not the 2 before it as well.
 
  • #12
shamieh said:
$$\frac{8}{2} \int \frac{sec^2\theta}{tan^2\theta + 4} \, d\theta$$
$$
u = tan^2\theta + 4$$
$$du = sec^2\theta \, d\theta$$ ?

This is what I suggest...first we have:

$$2\int\frac{4\sec^2(\theta)}{4\tan^2(\theta)+4}\, d\theta$$

Now, divide each term in the numerator and denominator of the integrand by 4:

$$2\int\frac{\sec^2(\theta)}{\tan^2(\theta)+1}\, d\theta$$

Now, can you rewrite the denominator of the integrand using a Pythagorean identity?
 
  • #13
When you say re write it as a pythagorean identity you mean do a substitution right?
 
  • #14
shamieh said:
When you say re write it as a pythagorean identity you mean do a substitution right?

Well, it is a substitution of sorts, but not like a typical $u$-substitution. Begin with the well-known Pythagorean identity:

$$\sin^2(\theta)+\cos^2(\theta)=1$$

and divide through by $\cos^2(\theta)$...what do you get?
 
  • #15
yea but why do i need to do sin + cos when you can make the U substitution for tan and sec?
 
  • #16
shamieh said:
yea but why do i need to do sin + cos when you can make the U substitution for tan and sec?
That will take you back to square one. You would exactly be reversing what you did.

Do you know what $\tan^2{x}+1$ is equal to? If no, then perhaps you didn't give MarkFL's question much thought; if yes, then where you have $\tan^2{x}+1$ in the integral replace that with what it equals and there isn't much left.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K