Undergrad What is the purpose of the vector α in the rotational work integral?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the vector α in the context of the method of images. Participants clarify that α is not a traditional polar vector but rather an axial pseudovector representing angular position relative to the z-axis. The integral's last line introduces a term dα, which appears to be a vector, leading to further debate about its representation. The consensus suggests that α should be understood as describing the rotation of the dipole around the z-axis. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the distinction between traditional vector representations and the specific use of pseudovectors in this context.
pherytic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This brief worked example from a textbook section on the method of images is confusing me.

Untitled.png


Specifically I am confused about the vector α in the integral on the last line.

When α (or θ) is an angle, I've only ever seen the vector quantity α (or θ) as a polar vector in the plane. But here, that can't be right because the dot product of the unit vectors α ⋅ z = 1, so they are clearly parallel.

What is the correct understanding of the vector α?

It seems like maybe it is supposed to be an axial pseudovector whose magnitude gives a sort of angular position in the plane normal to the vector. But I don't think I have ever seen a vector used this way and I am not sure it makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole with the negative direction of the ##x##-axis, as written in the solution. The virtual "image dipole" is the reflection of the dipole on the ##yz## plane.
 
vanhees71 said:
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole
I agree about ##\alpha##, but in the last equation there is a ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## that appears in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}\cdot\mathbf{N}##, which certainly looks like a vector.

I must say I don't recall seeing an angle represented that way, but since angular velocity is a pseudovector presumably ##\mathbf{\omega}\Delta t## is one too.

Note: the alpha in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## is supposed to be a mathbf alpha, but at least for me it doesn't render noticeably different from a regular alpha. Ditto the omega.
 
Sorry, I've not read the solution carefully enough. It's of course the axial vector ##\alpha \hat{z}##, describing the rotation of the dipole around the ##z##-axis.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K