What is the purpose of the vector α in the rotational work integral?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vector α in the rotational work integral is identified as an axial pseudovector, specifically representing the angular position of a dipole in relation to the negative x-axis. This interpretation clarifies that while α may resemble a polar vector, its role in the integral indicates it is not a traditional vector but rather a representation of rotation around the z-axis. The discussion highlights the distinction between the vector α and the differential vector dα, which is confirmed to describe the rotation of the dipole around the z-axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of axial pseudovectors and their properties.
  • Familiarity with the method of images in physics.
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics and angular position.
  • Basic concepts of vector mathematics, including dot products.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of axial pseudovectors in rotational dynamics.
  • Explore the method of images in electrostatics for deeper insights.
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of angular velocity as a pseudovector.
  • Investigate the implications of using vectors in physics, particularly in rotational systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals involved in rotational dynamics, particularly those studying vector representations in mechanics and electromagnetism.

pherytic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This brief worked example from a textbook section on the method of images is confusing me.

Untitled.png


Specifically I am confused about the vector α in the integral on the last line.

When α (or θ) is an angle, I've only ever seen the vector quantity α (or θ) as a polar vector in the plane. But here, that can't be right because the dot product of the unit vectors α ⋅ z = 1, so they are clearly parallel.

What is the correct understanding of the vector α?

It seems like maybe it is supposed to be an axial pseudovector whose magnitude gives a sort of angular position in the plane normal to the vector. But I don't think I have ever seen a vector used this way and I am not sure it makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole with the negative direction of the ##x##-axis, as written in the solution. The virtual "image dipole" is the reflection of the dipole on the ##yz## plane.
 
vanhees71 said:
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole
I agree about ##\alpha##, but in the last equation there is a ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## that appears in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}\cdot\mathbf{N}##, which certainly looks like a vector.

I must say I don't recall seeing an angle represented that way, but since angular velocity is a pseudovector presumably ##\mathbf{\omega}\Delta t## is one too.

Note: the alpha in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## is supposed to be a mathbf alpha, but at least for me it doesn't render noticeably different from a regular alpha. Ditto the omega.
 
Sorry, I've not read the solution carefully enough. It's of course the axial vector ##\alpha \hat{z}##, describing the rotation of the dipole around the ##z##-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K