What is the purpose of the vector α in the rotational work integral?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the vector α in the context of a rotational work integral, specifically within a worked example from a textbook on the method of images. Participants explore the nature of α, questioning whether it is a vector, an angle, or an axial pseudovector, and how it relates to the dipole's orientation and rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the vector α, suggesting it may be an axial pseudovector related to angular position, but is uncertain about this interpretation.
  • Another participant asserts that α is not a vector but rather the angle of the real dipole with respect to the negative x-axis, referencing the virtual image dipole's reflection.
  • A third participant agrees that α is not a vector but points out the presence of a term dα that resembles a vector, linking it to the concept of angular velocity as a pseudovector.
  • A later reply clarifies that α is indeed the axial vector α along the z-axis, indicating the rotation of the dipole around that axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the vector α, with multiple competing interpretations being presented, including views on whether it is an angle, a vector, or an axial vector.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity regarding the definitions and representations of α and its relationship to the dipole's orientation, as well as the notation used in the equations, which may lead to confusion.

pherytic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This brief worked example from a textbook section on the method of images is confusing me.

Untitled.png


Specifically I am confused about the vector α in the integral on the last line.

When α (or θ) is an angle, I've only ever seen the vector quantity α (or θ) as a polar vector in the plane. But here, that can't be right because the dot product of the unit vectors α ⋅ z = 1, so they are clearly parallel.

What is the correct understanding of the vector α?

It seems like maybe it is supposed to be an axial pseudovector whose magnitude gives a sort of angular position in the plane normal to the vector. But I don't think I have ever seen a vector used this way and I am not sure it makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole with the negative direction of the ##x##-axis, as written in the solution. The virtual "image dipole" is the reflection of the dipole on the ##yz## plane.
 
vanhees71 said:
It's not a vector but the angle of your real dipole
I agree about ##\alpha##, but in the last equation there is a ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## that appears in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}\cdot\mathbf{N}##, which certainly looks like a vector.

I must say I don't recall seeing an angle represented that way, but since angular velocity is a pseudovector presumably ##\mathbf{\omega}\Delta t## is one too.

Note: the alpha in ##d\mathbf{\alpha}## is supposed to be a mathbf alpha, but at least for me it doesn't render noticeably different from a regular alpha. Ditto the omega.
 
Sorry, I've not read the solution carefully enough. It's of course the axial vector ##\alpha \hat{z}##, describing the rotation of the dipole around the ##z##-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K