What is the quantum picture of laser field accelerating free electrons?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanics of laser fields and their interaction with free electrons, particularly in the context of high harmonic generation (HHG). Participants explore the implications of quantum electrodynamics (QED) on the absorption of photons by free electrons and the nature of the laser field as a coherent state rather than a simple photon emission process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that free electrons cannot absorb photons due to conservation of 4-momentum, referencing their understanding from QED.
  • Another participant challenges this understanding, suggesting that the process described does not fit the framework of scattering processes in QED and introduces the concept of virtual photons in Feynman diagrams.
  • A different participant emphasizes that in HHG, the photons involved are real photons from the laser, questioning the validity of the initial claim regarding photon absorption.
  • There is a call for a mathematical calculation to clarify the discussion and address perceived misconceptions regarding the interaction between the laser field and electrons.
  • One participant highlights that a laser emits a coherent state of the quantum electromagnetic field, which complicates the notion of photon absorption by free electrons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the nature of photon absorption by free electrons and the interpretation of laser emissions. There is no consensus on the validity of the initial claims or the role of virtual versus real photons in the described processes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion involves complex concepts from QED and may be hindered by incomplete understandings or misconceptions about the nature of the interactions involved.

gaiussheh
Messages
30
Reaction score
6
Free electrons can not absorb photons. Otherwise, the 4-momentum will not be conserved. That is what I understood from the very first lecture of QED.

However, we do have the semi-classical picture for HHG - electrons are kicked out from the atom and get accelerated by the radiation field. I have no question about the classical picture with pondermotive force etc.

But really, how is this process possible in the photon picture?

My first thought is that electrons do not absorb photons after they are ionised - they only gain energy from Keldish ionization. But this is not possible for very large n - the electrons must have already been ionised at some point.

Also, the pondermotive energy looks strange from the photon perspective. if the maximum energy scale as ##\omega^{-2}##, does that mean lower energy photons are way more likely (scale as ##\omega^{-3}##) to be absorbed than higher energy ones?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gaiussheh said:
Free electrons can not absorb photons. Otherwise, the 4-momentum will not be conserved. That is what I understood from the very first lecture of QED.
Then your understanding was incomplete. A more complete statement would be: there is no process permitted by QED (even more precisely, in QED specialised to analyze scattering processes) in which the only external lines are an incoming electron, an incoming photon, and an outgoing electron.

gaiussheh said:
how is this process possible in the photon picture?
Because "the photon picture" is not as simple as your (incomplete, see above) understanding is telling you. The process you describe is not a scattering process to begin with, so the correct version of what you were taught in the very first lecture of QED doesn't even apply. To the extent the process you describe can even be modeled using "the photon picture", the photons would have to be virtual photons, which correspond to internal lines in Feynman diagrams, not external lines in a scattering process.

The rest of your post simply compounds your basic error described above.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and Vanadium 50
PeterDonis said:
Then your understanding was incomplete. A more complete statement would be: there is no process permitted by QED (even more precisely, in QED specialised to analyze scattering processes) in which the only external lines are an incoming electron, an incoming photon, and an outgoing electron.


Because "the photon picture" is not as simple as your (incomplete, see above) understanding is telling you. The process you describe is not a scattering process to begin with, so the correct version of what you were taught in the very first lecture of QED doesn't even apply. To the extent the process you describe can even be modeled using "the photon picture", the photons would have to be virtual photons, which correspond to internal lines in Feynman diagrams, not external lines in a scattering process.

The rest of your post simply compounds your basic error described above.
Sure, you have as many virtual photons as you want in your Feynman diagram, but in HHG, the photons are real photons from the laser, and they do get absorbed as you really get ##n \hbar \omega## energy?
 
Why are you bringing in virtual photons?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
In fact, why don't you show us the calculation. Not an argument on what the calculation would show if you actually did it. Show us the calculation.
 
gaiussheh said:
in HHG, the photons are real photons from the laser
No, they're not. A laser does not emit photons. It emits a coherent state of the quantum electromagnetic field, which is not an eigenstate of photon number. This state interacts with the electron and gives it energy and momentum, but that interaction is nothing like "a free electron absorbing a photon".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and gaiussheh
I really would like him to write down equations - we have words, words, words, and they are all problematic. There are lots of misconceptions.

I hope a calculation will show the probelms, or if not, allow us to point to these problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, mitchell porter, PhDeezNutz and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K