What is the range of values for stability using the Routh-Hurwitz criterion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is applied to determine the stability of the polynomial equation ##s^3 + 3s^2 + 2(1 + K_p)s + 2K_i = 0##. The analysis reveals that for stability, the conditions ##K_p > -1## and ##K_i > 0## must be satisfied. Additionally, the relationship ##0 < \frac{K_i}{K_p} < 13.5## is established, but further investigation indicates that this conclusion may be incorrect, as testing with values ##K_i = 10## and ##K_p = 1## results in an unstable system. The correct conditions for stability include ##K_i \leq 3(1 + K_p)## and ##K_i \leq 3K_p##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion
  • Familiarity with polynomial equations and their roots
  • Basic knowledge of control systems and stability analysis
  • Experience with MATLAB for simulation and validation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion in control systems
  • Learn about MATLAB functions for stability analysis and simulation
  • Investigate the implications of parameter variations on system stability
  • Explore alternative stability criteria such as Nyquist and Bode plots
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students studying control systems, and anyone involved in stability analysis of dynamic systems will benefit from this discussion.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Find the stability of ##s^3 + 3s^2 + 2(1 + K_p)s + 2K_i = 0##.

Homework Equations


Routh-Hurwitz criterion

The Attempt at a Solution


By the Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion, we have
$$
\begin{array}{ccc}
s^3 & 1 & 2(1 + K_p)\\
s^2 & 3 & 2K_i\\
s^1 & \frac{6(1 + K_p) - 2K_i}{3} & 0\\
s^0 & 2K_i & 0
\end{array}
$$
From the ##s^3## line, we have that ##2(1 + K_p) > 0##; therefore, ##K_p > -1##. From the ##s^2## and ##s^0## line, we have that ##2K_i > 0##; thus, ##K_i > 0##. From the ##s^1## line, we have that ##6K_p - 2K_i + 6 > 0##; therefore,
$$
\frac{K_i}{K_p} < \frac{3}{K_p} + 3.
$$
I am supposed to conclude
$$
0 < \frac{K_i}{K_p} < 13.5.
$$
From line ##s^2##, we get greater than zero, but what do I do to go from ##\frac{3}{K_p} + 3## to ##13.5##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To be honest I do not know. I went through the routh-Hurwitz criterion and got the same results you did

If you plug in 10 for ki and 1 for kp the system is unstable (i ran it in matlab)
therefore the conclusion that 0<ki/kp<13.5 is incorrect

I recommend confirming that all the information you provided us is correct, and all the information provided to you is correct.
 
donpacino said:
To be honest I do not know. I went through the routh-Hurwitz criterion and got the same results you did

If you plug in 10 for ki and 1 for kp the system is unstable (i ran it in matlab)
therefore the conclusion that 0<ki/kp<13.5 is incorrect

I recommend confirming that all the information you provided us is correct, and all the information provided to you is correct.

Is the information from the book:
I had to use the link since the image appears too big on the site.
http://i.imgur.com/M5Ks5up.jpg?1

M5Ks5up.jpg
 
Last edited:
Must be an error in your book. Your Routh table is correct, so to avoid any sign changes in the first column for ##K_p > 0, K_i > 0##, we must have:
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> 6(1 + K_p) - 2K_i \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow K_i \leq 3(1 + K_p) \quad (1)<br /> \end{align}<br />
Although (1) being true is necessary and sufficient for stability, the weaker condition:
<br /> K_i \leq 3K_p \Leftrightarrow \frac{K_i}{K_p} \leq 3<br />
is sufficient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K