What is the rate of temperature change for a pizza floating in space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Floating Space
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a large pizza floating in outer space, initially at a temperature of 100°C. Participants are tasked with determining the rate of energy loss and the rate of temperature change of the pizza, given its dimensions, specific heat, density, and emissivity. The context includes considerations of heat transfer in a vacuum and the effects of background radiation temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for calculating the rate of energy loss and question whether all relevant information has been utilized. There are inquiries about the background temperature of space and how it affects calculations. Some participants suggest treating the pizza as a three-dimensional object and using the appropriate surface area for calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the calculations. Some guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem, particularly in terms of considering the pizza's shape and the relevant formulas. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly concerning the temperature of the surroundings and the implications for the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the background temperature of space is not absolute zero and that the pizza's three-dimensional nature must be accounted for in calculations. There is also mention of potential extraneous information in the problem statement that may not be necessary for solving the questions posed.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A large, hot pizza floats in outer space after being jettisoned as refuse from a spacecraft . (Suppose the pizza is 60 cm in diameter and 2.0 cm thick, sizzling at 100°C. There's a lot of water in the cheese, but a lot of air in the crust, so we estimate a specific heat and density for the pizza between that of water and that of air. Suppose its specific heat is c = 3000 J/kg · °C and its density is 500 kg/m3. Assume it is dark in the infrared, with emissivity of 0.8.)

What is the order of magnitude of its rate of energy loss?

(b) What is the order of magnitude of its rate of temperature change?

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



P= eσ(∏r2)(T4-Tc2)

e=0.8

∏r2= ∏(0.30)2

P=0.8(σ)(∏(0.30)2)((100+273.15)4-(273.15)4)

P=177.3

so magnitude of heat loss= ~10W

and for b) ~104 as per eqn.

is this right because there was a lot of information not used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charmedbeauty said:

Homework Statement



A large, hot pizza floats in outer space after being jettisoned as refuse from a spacecraft . (Suppose the pizza is 60 cm in diameter and 2.0 cm thick, sizzling at 100°C. There's a lot of water in the cheese, but a lot of air in the crust, so we estimate a specific heat and density for the pizza between that of water and that of air. Suppose its specific heat is c = 3000 J/kg · °C and its density is 500 kg/m3. Assume it is dark in the infrared, with emissivity of 0.8.)

What is the order of magnitude of its rate of energy loss?

(b) What is the order of magnitude of its rate of temperature change?

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



P= eσ(∏r2)(T4-Tc2)

e=0.8

∏r2= ∏(0.30)2

P=0.8(σ)(∏(0.30)2)((100+273.15)4-(273.15)4)

P=177.3

so magnitude of heat loss= ~10W

and for b) ~104 as per eqn.

is this right because there was a lot of information not used?

There may be extraneous information for the particular question asked, but it appears that you didn't make full use of the information that you did choose to use :smile:

Remember that a pizza is a three dimensional object -- it has more than just a top(pings) surface. Also, the background radiation temperature of space is not 0C; It's a tad cooler than that!
 
gneill said:
There may be extraneous information for the particular question asked, but it appears that you didn't make full use of the information that you did choose to use :smile:

Remember that a pizza is a three dimensional object -- it has more than just a top(pings) surface. Also, the background radiation temperature of space is not 0C; It's a tad cooler than that!


Shouldn't the background temp be -273.15K (absolute zero)?
because that's what I had

But since working in kelvins I had to change the pizza temp from 100°C to (100+273.15)K
is this right?

and for the Pizza shape can I use that formula for a volume?

Because I was not sure since it only had A for surface area.

If I can it should be more like...

eσ(∏r2h)(T4-Tc4)

and did part b seem right?
 
Since you don't have the temperature of the surroundings in space (it varies greatly depending on the position of the Sun), I'll just assume you're finding out the rate of heat loss of the pizza, not the NET rate of heat loss.

So ignore the temperature of the surroundings and use the formula:

eσAT^4

Well then for the rate of heat loss, like gneill said, the pizza is 3D. So treat it as a cylinder and use the surface area in the calculations, not the area of a circle.
 
charmedbeauty said:
Shouldn't the background temp be -273.15K (absolute zero)?
because that's what I had
Absolute zero is, well, zero in degrees K. -273.15 is its value in Celsius. (Although, if you want to be pedantic you could say that the background temperature of space is 2.7K, the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature, disregarding aberrations due to local sources).
But since working in kelvins I had to change the pizza temp from 100°C to (100+273.15)K
is this right?
Yes, that's correct. That's is value in Kelvins.
and for the Pizza shape can I use that formula for a volume?

Because I was not sure since it only had A for surface area.
Surface area is what you want. It has a top surface, a bottom surface, and sides...
and did part b seem right?
Part b is where the other information comes into play. The temperature of the pizza depends upon its heat content, specific heat, and mass. The rate of change of the heat content is the radiant heat loss as obtained in part a. So write an expression for the temperature of the pizza with respect to its heat content. Then decide how that temperature will change as the heat content changes (and you have the rate of change of the heat content).
 
gneill said:
Absolute zero is, well, zero in degrees K. -273.15 is its value in Celsius. (Although, if you want to be pedantic you could say that the background temperature of space is 2.7K, the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature, disregarding aberrations due to local sources).
Yes, that's correct. That's is value in Kelvins.

Surface area is what you want. It has a top surface, a bottom surface, and sides...

Part b is where the other information comes into play. The temperature of the pizza depends upon its heat content, specific heat, and mass. The rate of change of the heat content is the radiant heat loss as obtained in part a. So write an expression for the temperature of the pizza with respect to its heat content. Then decide how that temperature will change as the heat content changes (and you have the rate of change of the heat content).

So I just have...

eσ(2∏r(r+h))T4?? ---> where T=373.15

going from titanium pen's post?
 
Investigate the surface area of a closed cylinder. It has a circular top and bottom, and a cylinder for the sides.
 
gneill said:
Investigate the surface area of a closed cylinder. It has a circular top and bottom, and a cylinder for the sides.

I thnk it is 2∏rh+2∏r2?? i don't see how this is wrong?
 
charmedbeauty said:
I thnk it is 2∏rh+2∏r2?? i don't see how this is wrong?
My apologies. I didn't pay close enough attention to the fact that you had factored the expression in your previous post.

Yes, that's the surface area.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
gneill said:
My apologies. I didn't pay close enough attention to the fat that you had factored the expression in your previous post.

Yes, that's the surface area.

ok thanks gneill, so this expression is now correct.?
and for b)

let ∂= the answer of part a)

so ∂=mCpizzaΔT

find the mass by finding volume of pizza and use the density of pizza (given) to find its mass.


But I have a feeling it involves an integral...

perhaps evaluate the integral from Ti →Tc

so maybe ∫mCpizzaT, evaluate with given limits above??
 
  • #11
The expression for the heat loss rate looks fine.

No integral will be involved; you're looking for the instantaneous rate of temperature change. That means you want the rate of change of T given the current heat content.

Start with the expression for the heat content of the pizza (for the given temperature). Then make the heat content and temperature into differential elements. Essentially this is a differentiation with respect to t, or in other words, the rate of change of heat content with respect to the rate of change of temperature. But since you know the rate of change of heat content from (a) ...
 
  • #12
gneill said:
The expression for the heat loss rate looks fine.

No integral will be involved; you're looking for the instantaneous rate of temperature change. That means you want the rate of change of T given the current heat content.

Start with the expression for the heat content of the pizza (for the given temperature). Then make the heat content and temperature into differential elements. Essentially this is a differentiation with respect to t, or in other words, the rate of change of heat content with respect to the rate of change of temperature. But since you know the rate of change of heat content from (a) ...

ohh I think I get it

Qpizza=mCpizzaT

so dQ/dT=mCpizzadT.

where dQ/dT=answer from (a)

we know Ti=373.15

solve for Tf

then see what the difference between Ti and Tf is.?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K