What is the relationship between electric potential and work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between electric potential and work, particularly in the context of point charges. Key points include the differing interpretations of electric potential formulae, which may include or exclude a negative sign based on the perspective of energy transfer. The work done by the electric field is characterized as negative when energy is supplied by a battery, while work done by external forces is considered positive. The net result of these interactions is that energy is conserved, with no creation or destruction of energy occurring.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and work concepts in physics
  • Familiarity with integral calculus as applied to electric fields
  • Knowledge of point charge behavior in electrostatics
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of electric potential using integral calculus
  • Study the implications of negative work in electric fields
  • Investigate the role of external forces in energy transfer
  • Learn about energy conservation laws in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric potential and work relationships in electrostatics.

maskerach
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,


my questions are not really about an exercise or something "given". Instead, I'm having trouble understanding the concepts behind electric potential and work formulae/meaning. Maybe (probably) I missed the basics. Assume that I'm working with a puntiform charge.

1 - I've seen electric potential formulae (using the integral method) appear with and without a negative signal on the integral, and the limits were at the same position in both cases, no inverting at all: what are the differences?

2 - Why is work done by the electric field negative, and the work done by something other than the electric field positive? Wouldn't it make more sense if it was the other way around?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maskerach said:
1 - I've seen electric potential formulae (using the integral method) appear with and without a negative signal on the integral, and the limits were at the same position in both cases, no inverting at all: what are the differences?
Hi maskerach. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

It's all a matter of perspective. If it's a battery that is doing the work, then the battery is depleted of that energy. So a negative would be appropriate for it. For the actuator or heating element, it is work done on it, so positive would seem appropriate.

The nett result, energy sums to zero, meaning no energy was created or destroyed in the process. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For 1:

It could be for a variety of reasons. It might just mean that in the context only the magnitude of the potential matters, so you would just throw away the negative. It could also be that they do a bit of processing on the inside of the integral -- the integrand involves the dot product of the electric field and the displacement of the integration, so if this is negative they could have taken it out and canceled it with the other negative in front.

For 2:

I'm not quite sure what you mean -- the field can do both positive and negative work, and so can an external force. It just depends on the context.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K