What is the Relationship Between Period and Magnetic Field in a Cyclotron?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the period of a particle's motion and the magnetic field in a cyclotron, focusing on the underlying physics principles and equations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the period and magnetic field using the Lorentz force and centripetal acceleration. There are attempts to derive equations relating these concepts, with some questioning the assumptions made regarding the presence of electric fields in the cyclotron setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various algebraic manipulations and simplifications of the equations. Some participants provide feedback on the approaches taken, suggesting alternative methods for solving the equations. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the cyclotron's operation, particularly regarding the role of electric fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential influence of electric fields on the motion of particles in the cyclotron, specifically in the gaps between the D sections, which may affect the overall analysis.

TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am currently writing about Cyclotrons, and want to show how the period is related to the magnetic field.

Homework Equations



[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}[/tex]

[tex]\omega = \frac{v}{r}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have rearranged the above formula to give:

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi}{\frac{v}{r}} = \frac{2 \pi r}{v}[/tex]

Now a website now goes onto to say that this is equal to:

[tex]\frac{2 \pi r}{v} = \frac{2\pi mv}{qBv}[/tex]

Now I don't want to just write this down (for a start is plagarism, but anyway), so could anyone recommend some useful laws that mat come in useful?

Thanks in advanced,

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I start with the Lorentz force, and apply that to circular motion (either UCM or accelerated CM) of a charge in a combination of electric and magnetic fields:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force

Hope that helps.
 
The charge is held in a circular orbit in a cyclotron because the magnetic force (look up "Lorentz force law") produces an acceleration that is equal to the "centripetal acceleration for uniform circular motion". Look up those.
 
Thanks, So Lorentz Force:

[tex]F_{mag} = qv \times B[/tex]

Since these are perpendicular to each other:

[tex]F_{mag} = qvB[/tex]

This is then equal to the Centripetal acceleration:

[tex]a = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

thus centripetal force is:

[tex]F_{cent} = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]

These can thgus be equated when the particle is expirienceing constant circular motion (in the case of the cyclotron in the two 'D' sections):

[tex]F_{mag} = F_{cent} \therefore qvB = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]

From before,

[tex]\omega = \frac{v}{r}[/tex]

this can rearrnge for v,

[tex]v = \omega r[/tex]

Put into equation:

[tex]q \omega r B = \frac{m(\omega r)^2}{r}[/tex]

[tex]q \omega r B = \frac{m \omega^2 r^2}{r}[/tex]

[tex]q \omega r B = m \omega^2 r[/tex]

And, again:

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}[/tex]

rearranged:

[tex]\omega = \frac{2 \pi}{T}[/tex]

reinsert:

[tex]q \omega r B = m (\frac{2 \pi}{T})^2 r[/tex]

[tex]q \omega r B = m \frac{4 \pi^2}{T^2} r[/tex]

Rearrange to get T:

[tex]T^2 q \omega r B = m 4 \pi^2 r[/tex]

[tex]T^2 = \frac{m 4 \pi^2 r}{q \omega r B}[/tex]

[tex]T = sqrt{\frac{m 4 \pi^2 r}{q \omega r B}}[/tex]

does this look right? I didn't think there was a square root?

TFM
 
You seem to be taking algebraic steps that aren't getting you closer to what you want. You are also not cancelling variables when they appear on both sides and keeping way to many related variables around. You were almost done when you wrote qvB=mv^2/r. T=2*pi*r/v. Just solve the first equation for v and substitute into the second. Don't forget to cancel the 'v'. Don't write v=sqrt(rqvB/m). If you do that you haven't really 'solved' for v. There is still one on both sides.
 
Thank's, so:

[tex]qvB = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]

this can cancel down to:

[tex]qB = \frac{mv}{r}[/tex]

rearrange for v:

[tex]mv = rqB[/tex]

[tex]v = \frac{rqB}{m}[/tex]

So now we substitute this into:

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi r}{v}[/tex]

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi r}{\frac{rqB}{m}}[/tex]

This can be rearranged into:

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi r m}{rqB}[/tex]

Cancel down the r

[tex]T = \frac{2 \pi m}{qB}[/tex]

This looks a lot better.

Thanks,

TFM
 
Nice work TFM. Keep in mind, though, that you simplified the Lorentz force right away to assume no E field. That's okay, but may not be true in the case of the cyclotron (I don't know enough about cyclotrons to know whether that's true or not).
 
Well, the Electric field would only be in the gap between the two D sections, which is what accelerates the particles, not in the D sections themselves, so the circular motion in the D sections should not be affected. It also matches up with the formula from here;

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/cyclot.html

Thanks again,

TFM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K