What is the Relationship Between the Lorentz Transformations and Their Inverse?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Givne the Lorentz transformations (LTs)}, [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex], between the coordinates, [tex]x^{\mu} = (ct , \vec{r})[/tex] of an event as seen by O, and coordinates, [tex]x'^{\mu} = (ct', \vec{r'})[/tex] of the same event as seen by an inertial observer O', show that if we write the inverse transformation as [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta},\mbox{then} \ L_{\omega}^{\alpha} \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\omega} = \delta_{\beta}^{\alpha}[/tex]

WELL from the inverse transformation we ca figure out that
1... [tex]\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x'^{\omega}} = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x'^{\omega}}[/tex]

also
2... [tex]\frac{\partial x'^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\omega}} =L_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\omega}}[/tex]

there is a notation problem here that i am trying to resolve as well...
do i simply rearrange for L and tilde L andmultiply out??
mroe to come as i type it out
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't finish the statement of the problem!

Anyways, why did you differentiate anything?
 
p.s. corrected now
there was wayyy too much typing involved with the statement of the problem! AHH
 
Speaking of notation, since [itex]\Lambda[/itex] is a matrix, we use these conventions to denote its elements

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}{}_{\nu} ^[/tex]

for the direct transformation matrix.

and

[tex]\Lambda_{\nu}{}^{\mu}[/tex]

for its transposed.

However, since both [itex]\Lambda[/itex] and its transposed belong to [itex]\mbox{O(1,3)}[/itex], then the inverse of [itex]\Lambda[/itex] is equal to its transposed.

Daniel.
 
stunner5000pt said:
Givne the Lorentz transformations (LTs)}, [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex], between the coordinates, [tex]x^{\mu} = (ct , \vec{r})[/tex] of an event as seen by O, and coordinates, [tex]x'^{\mu} = (ct', \vec{r'})[/tex] of the same event as seen by an inertial observer O', show that if we write the inverse transformation as [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta},\mbox{then} \ L_{\omega}^{\alpha} \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\omega} = \delta_{\beta}^{\alpha}[/tex]

WELL from the inverse transformation we ca figure out that
1... [tex]\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x'^{\omega}} = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x'^{\omega}}[/tex]

also
2... [tex]\frac{\partial x'^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\omega}} =L_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\omega}}[/tex]

there is a notation problem here that i am trying to resolve as well...
do i simply rearrange for L and tilde L andmultiply out??
mroe to come as i type it out

there is no need to get into partial derivatives. You only need to use [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex] and [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta}[/tex]...Putting one into the other gives
[tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} L_{\nu}^{\beta} x^{\nu}[/tex]. But of course, when [tex]\alpha = \nu[/tex] the two sides are equal..Obviously, [tex]x^\alpha = \delta^\alpha_\nu x^\nu[/tex]. Therefore...