What is the Relationship Between the Lorentz Transformations and Their Inverse?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Givne the Lorentz transformations (LTs)}, [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex], between the coordinates, [tex]x^{\mu} = (ct , \vec{r})[/tex] of an event as seen by O, and coordinates, [tex]x'^{\mu} = (ct', \vec{r'})[/tex] of the same event as seen by an inertial observer O', show that if we write the inverse transformation as [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta},\mbox{then} \ L_{\omega}^{\alpha} \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\omega} = \delta_{\beta}^{\alpha}[/tex]

WELL from the inverse transformation we ca figure out that
1... [tex]\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x'^{\omega}} = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x'^{\omega}}[/tex]

also
2... [tex]\frac{\partial x'^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\omega}} =L_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\omega}}[/tex]

there is a notation problem here that i am trying to resolve as well...
do i simply rearrange for L and tilde L andmultiply out??
mroe to come as i type it out
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
p.s. corrected now
there was wayyy too much typing involved with the statement of the problem! AHH
 
Speaking of notation, since [itex]\Lambda[/itex] is a matrix, we use these conventions to denote its elements

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}{}_{\nu} ^[/tex]

for the direct transformation matrix.

and

[tex]\Lambda_{\nu}{}^{\mu}[/tex]

for its transposed.

However, since both [itex]\Lambda[/itex] and its transposed belong to [itex]\mbox{O(1,3)}[/itex], then the inverse of [itex]\Lambda[/itex] is equal to its transposed.

Daniel.
 
stunner5000pt said:
Givne the Lorentz transformations (LTs)}, [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex], between the coordinates, [tex]x^{\mu} = (ct , \vec{r})[/tex] of an event as seen by O, and coordinates, [tex]x'^{\mu} = (ct', \vec{r'})[/tex] of the same event as seen by an inertial observer O', show that if we write the inverse transformation as [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta},\mbox{then} \ L_{\omega}^{\alpha} \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\omega} = \delta_{\beta}^{\alpha}[/tex]

WELL from the inverse transformation we ca figure out that
1... [tex]\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x'^{\omega}} = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x'^{\beta}}{\partial x'^{\omega}}[/tex]

also
2... [tex]\frac{\partial x'^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\omega}} =L_{\beta}^{\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\beta}}{\partial x^{\omega}}[/tex]

there is a notation problem here that i am trying to resolve as well...
do i simply rearrange for L and tilde L andmultiply out??
mroe to come as i type it out

there is no need to get into partial derivatives. You only need to use [tex]x'^{\mu} = L_{\nu}^{\mu} x^{\nu}[/tex] and [tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} x'^{\beta}[/tex]...Putting one into the other gives
[tex]x^\alpha = \tilde{L}_{\beta}^{\alpha} L_{\nu}^{\beta} x^{\nu}[/tex]. But of course, when [tex]\alpha = \nu[/tex] the two sides are equal..Obviously, [tex]x^\alpha = \delta^\alpha_\nu x^\nu[/tex]. Therefore...