What is the RMS of this current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yosimba2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Rms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Root Mean Square (RMS) of a current described by the piecewise function 10t² for 0 ≤ t < 1 and 0 for 1 ≤ t < 2. The correct RMS calculation involves integrating the function over the specified intervals and dividing by the total period of 2 seconds. Participants clarify that the RMS value cannot be averaged from individual RMS values of segments but must be calculated using the mean of the squares of the entire function over the total time period.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RMS (Root Mean Square) calculations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of piecewise functions and their properties
  • Basic grasp of electrical current concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the RMS formula in detail
  • Practice integrating piecewise functions in calculus
  • Explore examples of RMS calculations in electrical engineering
  • Learn about the significance of averaging in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or electrical engineering, educators teaching calculus and signal analysis, and professionals working with electrical current measurements and analysis.

yosimba2000
Messages
206
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


Find the average current. The problem and given solution are in Untitled.png.

Homework Equations


RMS = sqrt((1/T)(integral of x^2 dt from 0 to T))

The Attempt at a Solution


From time 0 to 1, the equation describing current is 10t^2.

From time 1 to 2, the equation describing current is 0.

So RMS = sqrt((1/T)integral(10t^2 dt from 0 to 1)) + sqrt((1/T)integral(0 dt from 1 to 2)), where I use T = 1 for both T's because the 10t^2 occurs over 1 second, and the 0 amps also occurs over 1 second.

But I get the wrong answer...

Where did the book answer get 1/2 for the coefficient?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 416
Physics news on Phys.org
yosimba2000 said:
So RMS = sqrt((1/T)integral(10t^2 dt from 0 to 1)) + sqrt((1/T)integral(0 dt from 1 to 2)), where I use T = 1 for both T's because the 10t^2 occurs over 1 second, and the 0 amps also occurs over 1 second.
The first integral gives a result, say X. The second integral gives the result 0.

Adding these results gives X+0 = X, but you have integrated (totally) from 0 to 2, so to find the RMS-value ( root-mean-square ), you must divide by T, where T= 2-0 = 2.
Hence RMS = 1/2 * X.

The mean value is found by dividing by the time for a period, which here is 2s.
 
Last edited:
Hesch said:
The first integral gives a result, say X. The second integral gives the result 0.

Adding these results gives X+0 = X, but you have integrated (totally) from 0 to 2, so to find the RMS-value ( root-mean-square ), you must divide by T, where T= 2-0 = 2.
Hence RMS = 1/2 * X.

So if I understand this correctly, I first found the RMS of function 10t^2 from 0-1 seconds, then the RMS of function 0 amps from 1-2.

And then finally I average both RMS values? So it's kind of like averaging the averages (RMS's)?
 
To calculate the average over the whole period you should be dividing by the full period. It makes no difference whether you first sum the results of both integrations then divide by 2T, or whether you divide individual integrals by 2T before summing them, but the dividend needs to be 2T.

Suppose the signal2 was 8 for 0<t<1 and 0 for 1<t<2, you wouldn't claim its average over the whole 2 secs to still be 8, but that's the answer your maths would be giving.

You have a second mistake. The sqrt must be performed as the last operation, on the mean of the squares.
 
#3: I would formulate it: . . . . .

Well, let NascentOxygen explain.

His english is better than my english.
 
Ok, I was confused because I saw that the period was 2 seconds, and I'm used to seeing a period used for one continuous function, not multiple.

As in, if you were treat the curve from 0-2 seconds as 10t^2, you would see it clearly cannot be since 10t^2 won't make that horizontal line. So the curve must be made of two separate functions.

So I thought the book was saying the period of 2 seconds is described by the function 10t^2 alone, hence me questioning the 1/2 when clearly 10t^2 is only over a period of 1 second, and the 0 amps over the next 1 second.

*edit*

Wait I can't average the two RMS's?
 
yosimba2000 said:
So if I understand this correctly, I first found the RMS of function 10t^2 from 0-1 seconds, then the RMS of function 0 amps from 1-2.
That is what you did, and that's wrong.

And then finally I average both RMS values? So it's kind of like averaging the averages (RMS's)?
That is what you did, and that also is wrong.

I explained it in words earlier, but here is how you can write it using maths:

RMS = sqrt ( mean of ( sum of squares )))
 
Hmm ok it still doesn't make sense to me.

Why do I divide by 2 for period when the 10t^2 is only over 1 second? Likewise with the 0 amps?

I guess I could follow the formula, but I'd like to know the intuition behind it.

Like if I were doing this on the number of rats or something, the period would be switched with the number of samples I have.

Here, isn't my sample 1 second? If I use 2, that implies the 10t^2 function is applied over 2 seconds... but it's only 1 second
 
We are interested in knowing the contribution made to the whole period by each signal.

10t^2 existing for 1 sec contributes how much to our 2 sec average? It is best visualised by considering areas under the graph: how high will the rectangle be once you level out the components to show the average?
 
  • #10
Ah ok gotcha,

I started thinking of it in terms of animal samples and it made more sense.

Thanks everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K