What is the role of the i in the propagator of Feynman rules?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of the imaginary unit \( i \) in the propagator of Feynman rules, specifically in the context of scalar fields and the Klein-Gordon equation. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of the propagator in quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of the \( i \) in the propagator expression \( \frac{i}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon} \) and seeks clarification on its significance.
  • Another participant explains that the \( i \) arises from the path-integral formulation of the generating functional for connected Green's functions, specifically in the expression for \( Z[J] \).
  • A third participant acknowledges their earlier oversight regarding the factor \( i \) in Wick contractions, indicating a realization about its importance.
  • One participant references Chapter 10 of Srednicki's work as a resource for understanding how the Feynman rules, including the factor of \( i \), are derived.
  • Another participant notes that Srednicki's approach differs from that of their own textbook, expressing interest in exploring this alternative perspective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of \( i \) in the propagator, as there are differing approaches and interpretations presented. The discussion remains open with multiple viewpoints expressed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific texts and approaches, indicating that the understanding of the propagator may depend on the chosen framework or source material.

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0
I'm probably missing something small but I haven't been able to figure this out. In the Feynman rules (for a scalar field that obeys the Klein-Gordon equation), you write a propagator for internal lines as

[tex] \frac{i}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.[/tex]

The propagator integrand is originally

[tex] \frac{e^{i k (x-y)}}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.[/tex]

Since we're dealing with an internal line, both exponentials, in [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex], are integrated out to delta functions, leaving you with

[tex] \frac{1}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.[/tex]

That I see, but where does the [itex]i[/itex] in the numerator of the first expression above come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This factor i comes from the i in the path-integral formula for the generating functional for (connected Green's functions), [tex]W[J]=\ln Z[J][/tex] with

[tex]Z[J]=\int \mathcal{D} \phi \exp[\mathrm{i} \int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x [\mathcal{L}(\phi,\partial \phi)+J \phi]].[/tex]
 
Ah, I think I got it. I had ignored the factor [itex]i[/itex] when I wrote things down as Wick contractions. Thanks.
 
Chapter 10 of Srednicki is a good way to see the Feynman rules emerge, including this factor of i.
 
He seems to adopt quite a different approach than the author of the book I'm using. I may have a look at that later. Thanks for the tip.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K