What is the rotational kinetic energy of a clock's hour and minute hands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Rotation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total rotational kinetic energy of a clock's hour and minute hands, with lengths of 2.7m and 4.5m and masses of 60kg and 100kg respectively, is calculated using the formula for rotational kinetic energy, KErot = (1/6)mr2ω2. The correct angular velocities are ωhour = 1.45x10-4 rad/s and ωminute = 0.001745 rad/s, leading to a total energy of approximately 0.002058J. This calculation corrects earlier errors regarding the periods used for each hand's rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational kinetic energy formulas
  • Knowledge of angular velocity calculations
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia concepts
  • Basic physics principles related to motion and energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes, particularly thin rods
  • Learn about the applications of rotational kinetic energy in mechanical systems
  • Explore the differences between angular velocity and linear velocity
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of rotational motion and energy calculations.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
The hour hand and the minute hand of a clock are 2.7m long and 4.5m long and have masses of 60kg and 100kg respectively. Calculate the total rotational kinetic energy of the two hands about the axis of rotation.

w=circumfrence/time=2rpi/t=2(2.7m)pi/86400s
w=1.96x10^{-4}rad/s
w=circumfrence/time=2rpi/t=2(4.5m)pi/3600s
w=0.00785rad/s
energy=[m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[m_2r_2^2w_2^2]
energy=[60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.96x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.00785rad/s)^2]
energy=0.1248J

is this the total energy of the two hands?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, your angular velocity \omega is a measure of radians per second. This means that it is independent of the radius. So your forumula for each angular velocity should be \omega=2\pi/T.

Also, the rotational inertia of a thin rod rotating about an axis through one end and perpendicular to length (IIRC) should be I=1/3MR^2.

I think that's about right, check it out and tell me if you see any mistakes. :)
 
w=2pi/t=2pi/86400s
w=7.27x10^{-5}rad/s
w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s
w=0.001745rad/s
energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2]
energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(7.27x10^{-5}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2]
energy=0.0020569J

is this correct? and why is it so small?
 
Because you used the WRONG periods:the one for a (mean solar) DAY and an hour,instead of an hour and one minute,respectively.:-p

Daniel.
 
it takes 12 hrs for the hour hand to rotate 360 degrees...(43200s)
it takes 1 hr for the minute hand to rotate 360 degrees...(3600s)

w=2pi/t=2pi/43200s
w=1.45x10^{-4}rad/s
w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s
w=0.001745rad/s
energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2]
energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.45x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2]
energy=0.002058J

is this correct?
 
UrbanXrisis said:
it takes 12 hrs for the hour hand to rotate 360 degrees...(43200s)
it takes 1 hr for the minute hand to rotate 360 degrees...(3600s)

w=2pi/t=2pi/43200s
w=1.45x10^{-4}rad/s
w=2pi/t=2pi/3600s
w=0.001745rad/s
energy=[(1/3)m_1r_1^2w_1^2]+[(1/3)m_2r_2^2w_2^2]
energy=[(1/3)*60kg*(2.7m)^2*(1.45x10^{-4}rad/s)^2]+[(1/3)*100kg*(4.5m)^2*(0.001745rad/s)^2]
energy=0.002058J

is this correct?

UrbanXrisis, you are simplifying the clock hands as thin rods, right? Then where did you derive the formula for rotational KE: KE_{rot} = 1/3mr^2\omega^2? If the moment of inertia for a thin rod is 1/12 then KE_{rot} = 1/24mr^2\omega^2.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
Nope,the moment of inertia is I=\frac{1}{3}ml^{2}...Don't believe me,see here:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html Scroll down till u hit a link with moment of inertia...

Daniel.

P.S.I hope u see where your assumption went wrong... :rolleyes:
Aaaa, I see, then the coefficient is 1/2*1/3 = 1/6.
 
  • #11
Are you kidding dude? I'm now talking about the rotational KE not about the moment of inertia. If I = 1/3mr^2, then
KE_{rot} = 1/2I\omega^2 = 1/2(1/3mr^2)\omega^2 = 1/6mr^2\omega^2, and not the result from UrbanXrisis:
KE_{rot} = 1/3mr^2\omega^2
 
  • #12
Yes,then i agree...Didn't figure out what u meant.


Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K