What is the significance of dipoles in condensed matter physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marc32123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipoles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the significance of dipoles in condensed matter physics, emphasizing that while dipoles in chemistry typically refer to polarized molecules, physics often considers idealized mathematical point dipoles. The concepts are fundamentally identical, representing charge distributions that deviate from spherical symmetry. In condensed matter physics, both electric and magnetic polarizations are relevant, with polarons being a key concept introduced by Landau. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for researchers in both fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of intrinsic dipoles in physics
  • Familiarity with polarized molecules in chemistry
  • Basic knowledge of condensed matter physics
  • Concept of polarons as introduced by Landau
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of point dipoles in physics
  • Explore the role of polarons in condensed matter physics
  • Study the principles of electric and magnetic polarization
  • Investigate the differences in teaching methodologies between physics and chemistry regarding dipoles
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, students, and educators in physics and chemistry, particularly those focusing on dipole interactions and condensed matter phenomena.

marc32123
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Question about dipoles...

What is the difference between a dipole in physics and a dipole in chemistry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None.
Depends at what level you are doing it at though - I think physics teaches intrinsic dipoles and dipole models where the separation of charges tends to zero before chemistry does.
 
marc32123 said:
What is the difference between a dipole in physics and a dipole in chemistry?

What brought up this question? Did you come across something that made you think that there might be a difference between the two?

Zz.
 
I am just curious, I really don't know much about dipoles and just started a little research on it because I keep coming across the word in my recent research into chemistry. Same with the word polar or polarity.
 
Figured - the concepts can look different when you start learning about them because context is important to what gets taught.

Note: you need to be careful about attaching too much importance to semantics in science - words often have odd uses because a label got stuck sometime in history. Concentrate on the principles behind the words.
 
Dipoles in chemistry usually refer to polarized molecules, whereas in physics they sometimes are referring to idealized mathematical point dipoles.

However, the concept is identicle - some charge distribution which deviates from spherical symmetry.
 
Wow - that's creepy!
dipole wrote exactly what my first response was...
 
dipole said:
Dipoles in chemistry usually refer to polarized molecules, whereas in physics they sometimes are referring to idealized mathematical point dipoles.

Note that this may be true when dealing with the idealized and simplified situation in the learning of classical E&M. However, it isn't true in general. In condensed matter physics, we certainly deal with polarized molecules, etc., both electric and magnetic. One only need to look at the concept of polarons, introduced by Landau.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K