What is the significance of multiple videos of the same event?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lacy33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of multiple videos depicting the same event, with participants exploring the authenticity of the footage, the possibility of it being a hoax, and the implications of such sightings. The conversation touches on themes of skepticism, the nature of evidence, and the reactions of individuals witnessing the event, with a focus on both technical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the videos, hoping for more footage if the event is real.
  • Several participants suggest that the videos may be a hoax, citing the ease of digital manipulation and the potential for fabrication.
  • Questions arise regarding the behavior of the camera operator in the first video, with some wondering why they did not follow the object with the camera.
  • There are discussions about the physical plausibility of the objects shown in the videos, with some arguing that the acceleration would be lethal to any biological entity.
  • Some participants propose that if the event were genuine, it would likely attract more substantial evidence or witnesses from diverse backgrounds.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of dramatic displays from purported alien technology, with references to known physics and the limitations of current engineering capabilities.
  • Participants share links to external sources for further context and analysis of the videos.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views on the authenticity of the videos and the nature of the event. Some believe it could be a hoax, while others remain open to the possibility of it being real.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on subjective interpretations of video footage, the absence of corroborating evidence from independent sources, and the potential for misinterpretation of visual phenomena.

  • #61
Lacy33 said:
No, look at the second links posted by MacLaddy (thank you). Written on the video are the people who are coming out and saying they have seen this. Am I wrong? I tried to copy it but its on the video.

The person writing it is from a UFO and Paranormal website and claims they're planning a massive cover up.

The fact the last section says "the government and media are lying to you, aliens are visiting earth, demand your government tell the truth" says it all.

These are UFO nut jobs. Nothing credible there.

I could show them exactly how one of these videos is faked and they'd still tell me I'm talking through my ***.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
jarednjames said:
The person writing it is from a UFO and Paranormal website and claims they're planning a massive cover up.

The fact the last section says "the government and media are lying to you, aliens are visiting earth, demand your government tell the truth" says it all.

These are UFO nut jobs. Nothing credible there.

I could show them exactly how one of these videos is faked and they'd still tell me I'm talking through my ***.

I see now. I was trying to read it in small print.
So you you think all of these Dome videos are fake or are you just saying about any fake ufo this group would not believe cause they are close minded?
 
  • #64
"While there are those which eliminate the possibility that contempt aliens and holidays over the wall, other scientists argue: It is very possible that the wall is an attraction for beings from outer space," "At first, residents did not seem unusual phenomenon, but soon began to sparkle ball to make movements over the Old City"

Couldn't have said it better myself. (I think) :confused:
 
  • #65
Lacy33 said:
OK! Now what? We all have to get along or something? I hate everyone.
I don't want to be good.
I didn't know we had neighbors! :cry:

I don't know what this means, or the part in the post after it about small print.
 
  • #66
I am fairly confident of the "Hoax" label after reading the comments from the locals. Interesting how little buzz this is creating in the area.
 
Last edited:
  • #67
Lacy33 said:
So you you think all of these Dome videos are fake

I do, pending further evidence.
are you just saying about any fake ufo this group would not believe cause they are close minded?

I am. The basic attitude shown on that video tells you all you need to know about them.
 
  • #68
macladdy said:
couldn't have said it better myself. (i think) :confused:

lol!
 
  • #69
Nicodemus said:
I don't know what this means, or the part in the post after it about small print.

I was admitting I was not ready to face a reality of UFO's and the part about the small print is where I missread and thought there were many people who were now coming out saying they saw it.

So we conclude here that the Dome UFO's are a hoax of some type and not real at all? Well until one lands on our picnic table?
 
  • #70
Lacy33 said:
So we conclude here that the Dome UFO's are a hoax of some type and not real at all? Well until one lands on our picnic table?

Well let's review the evidence:

1. Four sketchy videos.
2. No eye witnesses identified (outside of the video owners - careful, they are flaunting them as separate eye witnesses in some sources - clever wording).
3. No official reports of anything outside of the videos.
4. The only people claiming potential eye witnesses so far are a UFO/Paranormal crackpot site.
5. Potential link to a movie viral ad campaign.

Would you say things are looking good for it?
 
  • #71
jarednjames said:
1. Four sketchy videos.

Actually, I believe that would be "Three sketchy videos." The third one to come out is obviously a fake.
 
  • #72
jarednjames said:
Well let's review the evidence:

1. Four sketchy videos.
2. No eye witnesses identified (outside of the video owners - careful, they are flaunting them as separate eye witnesses in some sources - clever wording).
3. No official reports of anything outside of the videos.
4. The only people claiming potential eye witnesses so far are a UFO/Paranormal crackpot site.
5. Potential link to a movie viral ad campaign.

Would you say things are looking good for it?

I would agree that you collected a pretty good sample of a couple days work for the folks here.
I might also add that this (event), if it happened, did so over the a piece of land that has to be the most potentially combustible piece of real estate on the planet. That the aliens want it too? Am I suprised?
I think this has been very interesting and fun.

I remain in wait mode.

OMgosh! I hope they did not come for Ed Witten! His students say he is an alien. :eek:
 
  • #73
MacLaddy said:
Actually, I believe that would be "Three sketchy videos." The third one to come out is obviously a fake.

What do you think of the 4th one?
 
  • #74
jarednjames said:
Well let's review the evidence:

1. Four sketchy videos.
2. No eye witnesses identified (outside of the video owners - careful, they are flaunting them as separate eye witnesses in some sources - clever wording).
3. No official reports of anything outside of the videos.
4. The only people claiming potential eye witnesses so far are a UFO/Paranormal crackpot site.
5. Potential link to a movie viral ad campaign.

Would you say things are looking good for it?

It's easier to call it a hoax but then are you familar with the entire UFO phenomena. Do you think Budd Hopkins is a hoax? I'm asking this because in the book Sight Unseen, Budd Hopkins mentioned that UFOs can be made to appear to certain people only. In fact, some abductions allegedly occurred in busy street at daytime with the UFO hovering at the abductee's house. One time, an abductee was lowered to the ground floor while being taken up from 5th floor. I don't have proof of any of this. Just mentioning it. Now what has this got to do with Temple Mount sightings? The UFO above can initiate a Lorentz metric spacetime holographic inserts such that in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, the UFO would be invisible to the people. While outside the spacetime override zone, it is visible. In Einstein block spacetime, the spacetime in the temple mount is not the same as the spacetime a mile away. There are differences in the space and time components which the aliens could manipulate to make the UFO visible in one place and invisible in the other place.

Of course I don't have any proof of this. I'm just mentioning the research of abduction researchers like Budd Hopkins. What's the consensus here of Hopkins? Is he a fraud? Show supporting evidence he is a fraud. I'm all ears. I don't have any consensus about abductions.

Best thing to do in this UFO Temple mount incidents is to round up the witnesses and give them lie detector tests and investigate them because if the spacetime holographic insertion technology by the aliens is real, only they could be in the vantage point to witness or record them.

Now what is the light doing at the Temple Mount. Rumor has it that below the Temple Mount lie an ancient technology called the Ark of the Covenant. Temples are build over it to house it and protect it. So it's not impossible that UFOs are involved in this possible ancient connection.

Am I getting nuts? Lol.. dispute what I'm saying as I'm more comfortable if they were wrong. Debunk all UFO incidents and it's better for our peace of mind that way. We already have trouble dealing with Bin Laden.. An interplanetary mafia is more distressing. Lol...
 
  • #75
Alfrez said:
It's easier to call it a hoax but then are you familar with the entire UFO phenomena. Do you think Budd Hopkins is a hoax? I'm asking this because in the book Sight Unseen, Budd Hopkins mentioned that UFOs can be made to appear to certain people only. In fact, some abductions allegedly occurred in busy street at daytime with the UFO hovering at the abductee's house. One time, an abductee was lowered to the ground floor while being taken up from 5th floor. I don't have proof of any of this. Just mentioning it. Now what has this got to do with Temple Mount sightings? The UFO above can initiate a Lorentz metric spacetime holographic inserts such that in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, the UFO would be invisible to the people. While outside the spacetime override zone, it is visible. In Einstein block spacetime, the spacetime in the temple mount is not the same as the spacetime a mile away. There are differences in the space and time components which the aliens could manipulate to make the UFO visible in one place and invisible in the other place.

Of course I don't have any proof of this. I'm just mentioning the research of abduction researchers like Budd Hopkins. What's the consensus here of Hopkins? Is he a fraud? Show supporting evidence he is a fraud. I'm all ears. I don't have any consensus about abductions.

Best thing to do in this UFO Temple mount incidents is to round up the witnesses and give them lie detector tests and investigate them because if the spacetime holographic insertion technology by the aliens is real, only they could be in the vantage point to witness or record them.

Now what is the light doing at the Temple Mount. Rumor has it that below the Temple Mount lie an ancient technology called the Ark of the Covenant. Temples are build over it to house it and protect it. So it's not impossible that UFOs are involved in this possible ancient connection.

Am I getting nuts? Lol.. dispute what I'm saying as I'm more comfortable if they were wrong. Debunk all UFO incidents and it's better for our peace of mind that way. We already have trouble dealing with Bin Laden.. An interplanetary mafia is more distressing. Lol...

And thank you very much. I was aware of much of this as well. would you please call me> thank you.
 
  • #76
Lacy33 said:
What do you think of the 4th one?

The fourth one seems more convincing on the surface, but there is some speculation regarding the zoom feature. This YouTube user is so determined to prove that it's a hoax that I believe he/she will find anything they want, nevertheless, it is somewhat convincing.

http://www.youtube.com/user/HOAXKiller1#p/a/u/1/uKR1OIQFsFg
 
  • #77
Alfrez said:
It's easier to call it a hoax but then are you familar with the entire UFO phenomena. Do you think Budd Hopkins is a hoax? I'm asking this because in the book Sight Unseen, Budd Hopkins mentioned that UFOs can be made to appear to certain people only.

Well then, that's only slightly convenient. As a recovering Coastaholic I am very familiar with Budd Hopkins and his little square pieces of paper.

Why are UFOlogists always authors?
 
  • #78
Alfrez said:
It's easier to call it a hoax but then are you familar with the entire UFO phenomena. Do you think Budd Hopkins is a hoax? I'm asking this because in the book Sight Unseen, Budd Hopkins mentioned that UFOs can be made to appear to certain people only. In fact, some abductions allegedly occurred in busy street at daytime with the UFO hovering at the abductee's house. One time, an abductee was lowered to the ground floor while being taken up from 5th floor. I don't have proof of any of this. Just mentioning it. Now what has this got to do with Temple Mount sightings? The UFO above can initiate a Lorentz metric spacetime holographic inserts such that in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, the UFO would be invisible to the people. While outside the spacetime override zone, it is visible. In Einstein block spacetime, the spacetime in the temple mount is not the same as the spacetime a mile away. There are differences in the space and time components which the aliens could manipulate to make the UFO visible in one place and invisible in the other place.

Of course I don't have any proof of this. I'm just mentioning the research of abduction researchers like Budd Hopkins. What's the consensus here of Hopkins? Is he a fraud? Show supporting evidence he is a fraud. I'm all ears. I don't have any consensus about abductions.

There is absolutely no evidence to back any of this up. Period. It's all techno-babble and psuedo-science. Nothing of substance in the above.

It is not down to us to disprove anything. If you (or this Hopkins guy) make a claim, the responsibility is with you (him) to back it up with evidence. That is how it works. Until then, there is no reason to believe anything you/he claims.

Please note the site rules on overly speculative posts and personal theories (that covers everything in your post).
Best thing to do in this UFO Temple mount incidents is to round up the witnesses and give them lie detector tests and investigate them because if the spacetime holographic insertion technology by the aliens is real, only they could be in the vantage point to witness or record them.

As above.
Now what is the light doing at the Temple Mount. Rumor has it that below the Temple Mount lie an ancient technology called the Ark of the Covenant. Temples are build over it to house it and protect it. So it's not impossible that UFOs are involved in this possible ancient connection.

As above.

Start backing your posts up or stop posting this rubbish.
 
  • #79
How about this one.
The Jews when receiving the Torah were not at the foot of the mountain.
They were "under it" Yeah!
One secret per night.
This is a really loaded topic for now. ...
Let's all meet for ice cream! :biggrin:
 
  • #80
Lacy33 said:
How about this one.
The Jews when receiving the Torah were not at the foot of the mountain.
They were "under it" Yeah!
One secret per night.
This is a really loaded topic for now. ...
Let's all meet for ice cream! :biggrin:


I give up, are you taking this seriously or just posting random stuff here? I can't make sense of half the stuff you've written here.
 
  • #81
Locked pending moderation.
 

Similar threads

Finding support to complete a UK charity registration application
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
2021 Summer Olympics (Tokyo): July 23 (Friday) - August 8 (Sunday)
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
YouTube purging chemistry videos
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
High School Is quantum coherence a random event?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
PF's favorite movies poll - nominations
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
Undergrad Unidentified Luminescent Phenomena (ULP)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Question about the Entropy of a Black Hole Singularity
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Undergrad Karatsuba multiplication implementation question
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Countdown to Doom Release: Revisit the Original and Celebrate with Easter Eggs
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Graduate What exactly is a "rare event"? (Poisson point process)
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K