What is the Solution for Solving an Equation for y?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steve snash
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation log5(14y-12) = 2x^6 - 13 for the variable y. The problem involves logarithmic manipulation and understanding the relationship between logarithmic and exponential forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore converting the logarithmic equation into an exponential form. Some suggest rewriting the logarithm using natural logarithms, while others question the necessity of this step. The original poster expresses confusion about how to isolate y and questions the validity of their derived expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on logarithmic properties and transformations. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the best approach to isolate y, and some participants affirm the correctness of the original poster's derived expression, despite their self-doubt.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the correctness of the derived solution, and participants are navigating the complexities of logarithmic equations without reaching a definitive consensus on the method to simplify further.

steve snash
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


solve the equation for y,
log5 (14y-12)=2x^6-13

The Attempt at a Solution


ive got no idea how to work it out I am guessing it must be something to do with making the left side with y equal 1, log5 5 =1 but how do i get that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every log equation can be written as an equivalent exponential equation, and that's what you want to do here.

The basic idea is that M = logaN <==> N = aM
 
it may help by re-writing the log base b as:
log_b(z) = \frac{ln(z)}{ln(b)}
 
lanedance said:
it may help by re-writing the log base b as:
log_b(z) = \frac{ln(z)}{ln(b)}
Or maybe not. The OP would like to solve for y, which means he needs to get rid of the log part, not write it in some other base.
 
fair point - i was heading in the same direction, I've just found a lot of people find it easier convert:
X = lnY <==> Y = eM
rather than
M = logaN <==> N = aM
though i know it is really just a redundant step
 
that makes the equation come up as (14y-12)=5^(2x^6-13)
this then becomes ,
y=(5^(2x^6-13)+12)/14
which i found is the wrong answer =(
is there a way to get rid of the 5^ and simplify it down?
 
What do you mean "found is the wrong answer"? That is a perfectly good solution to the problem.
 
really, sweet ty hallsofivy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K