What is the solution for the total resistance of the infinite ladder network?

  • Thread starter Thread starter strangequark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Resistors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the total resistance of an infinite ladder network of resistors, each valued at 1 ohm. The configuration consists of resistors arranged in a repeating pattern of series and parallel connections.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the arrangement of resistors, considering the series and parallel combinations. There is an attempt to calculate the total resistance through iterative approximations, questioning whether the results converge to a finite value. Some participants suggest visualizing the configuration better and exploring symmetry in the arrangement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on the resistance calculations and the structure of the ladder network. Some guidance has been provided regarding the formulation of equations to analyze the circuit, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or final value.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential difficulties in visualizing the resistor ladder and the need for clearer representations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks confirmation or direction.

strangequark
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the total resistance (each R = 1 ohm) of the infinite ladder network that looks something like this:
Code:
!--------!------R-----!------R----!------R-----!----- etc
!        !            !           !            !
V        R            R           R            R
!        !            !           !            !
!--------!------R-----!------R----!------ R----!----- etc

Homework Equations



I assume the revelant equations are:

1/Ra+1/Rb=1/Rab or Rab=(RaRb)/(Ra+Rb) (in parallel)

and Ra+Rb=Rab (in series)

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, I keep wanting to say that the resistors on the top and bottom are in parallel, and that each center resistor is in series with the parallel combo... so I get something like:

1/2 + 1= (3/2) ~ 1.5for the first tier:

Then 3/8+1= 11/8 ~1.375 for the second,

Then 11/30+1= 41/30 ~ 1.36667 for the third

Then 41/112+1= 153/112 ~ 1.36607 for the fourth

and so on...

Now, it is looking like it might converge to some finite value in the quasi-near future... so i might not be completely wrong, but it would be nice to know prior to staying up all night looking for an infinite series to represent it.

Is this correct, or if not, can someone please steer me in the right direction?

Any assistance is much appreciated...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to the PF stragequark.

It's hard to visualize the resistor ladder that you are asking about. Maybe try the "code" keyword in square brackets "[]" to force non-proportional spacing, or just attach a PDF or other document.

With long or infinite ladder configurations, I'll try to see if there is a symmetry that let's me fold up the parallel-series combinations below. Kind of like how an R-2R ladder DAC works.
 
Suppose the resistance of the whole ladder is RL.

Then the following two circuits have the same resistance:
Code:
!--------!
!        !
V        RL
!        ! 
!--------!

and

Code:
!--------!------R-----!
!        !            !
V        R            RL
!        !            !
!--------!------R-----!

This is a common way of analysing transmission lines, etc.
 
All you need to do is solve this equation:
RL = 1/(1/R + 1/(2*R+RL))

And if R = 1:
RL = 1/(1 + 1/(2+RL))
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
4K