MHB What is the solution to the exponential series limit problem?

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Evaluation of $\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}e^{-n}\sum^{n}_{k=0}\frac{n^k}{k!}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose the "n" in \frac{n^k}{k!} were "x". Do you recognize \sum_{k= 0}^n \frac{x^k}{k!} as a partial sum for the power series \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^k}{k!}= e^x?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Suppose the "n" in \frac{n^k}{k!} were "x". Do you recognize \sum_{k= 0}^n \frac{x^k}{k!} as a partial sum for the power series \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^k}{k!}= e^x?

So, the limit should be just 1, right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem was posted in the challenge forum. Please provide full solutions. And please hide them including any hints between spoiler tags.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top