What Is the Spacing Between the Slits in the Double Slit Experiment?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the double slit experiment, specifically focusing on calculating the spacing between two slits using an interference pattern created by a helium-neon laser. The problem involves interpreting the relevant formula and plugging in the correct values to find the slit spacing in millimeters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the formula for fringe spacing and question the accuracy of their calculations. There is uncertainty about the interpretation of the variables and the correct setup of the equation.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, including suggestions to ensure all calculations are done accurately and to clarify the formula used. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the number of fringes observed and how that affects the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a scientific calculator for some, which may be impacting their ability to verify calculations. There is also mention of a potential misinterpretation regarding the number of fringes counted, which could affect the outcome.

Spirochete
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light from a helium-neon laser (wave length 633 nm) is used to illuminate two narrow slits. The interference pattern is observed on a screen 3.1 m behind the slits. Twelve bright fringes are seen, spanning a distance of 50 mm

What is the spacing, in mm, between the slits?

Homework Equations



I believe it is:

Ym=m(wavelength)/d

Where L is the distance from the slits, m is an integer describing how many fringes up or down you are, d is the slit spacing and Ym is the distance to the mth bright fringe.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure if I'm interpreting the equation correctly. I plugged in 6 for m and 25x10^-3 meters for Ym and came up with the answer 0.469 mm. This is the wrong answer. My logical is that the distance from the center will give you the distance to the 6th fringe, and that would be half the total distance spanned.

Is this the correct way to plug in numbers for that equation?

Or I might be making some minor mistake because I don't have access to a scientific calculator (lost it today) and I'm also exhausted.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an error in the formula "Ym=m(wavelength)/d"
It needs an L on the top.

What is the question - what are you trying to find?
 
oooh I forgot to give the question!

What is the spacing, in mm, between the slits?
 
Okay, that's the d in the formula.
I got an answer just a wee tiny bit larger than yours . . .
Recommend you solve the formula for d =, put in all the numbers and run them through your calculator all at once so no rounding.

If you still have no calculator, use the one on your computer or just leave the 10^-9 out and remember your answer will be in nm.
 
so the numbers I'm plugging in look correct?
 
Yes, they do. I do wonder about one thing - there is a bright central maximum "spot" so the question should have said an odd number of fringes were seen. Likely that is something to ignore and your only problem is a slight inaccuracy in your calculator work. If you get the same answer again, perhaps you should write exactly what you are putting into the calculator.
I have d = mL*lambda/x = ...
 
Yeah I had a friend online plug my numbers into a calculator and it ended up as 4.70952x10^-4 meters which corresponds to 0.471 m. Still wrong.

My algebra is the same as yours.
 
I got 4.71 x 10^-4 meters.
That's .000471 meters or 0.471 mm.
Not 0.471 m.
 
wow I'm tired I mistype again I'm sorry.

The question does ask for the answer in mm, so 0.471 should be correct if everything else is right
 
  • #10
Thanks for your help so far it's my bed time so I won't be replying every seconds any more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K