Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,702
- 1,587
I can't solve the three body problem, but I can take three bodies, let them move and attach an accelerometer to one of them. I can then take one of the three bodies and accelerate them in the exact same manner by pushing it with my hand (for precision's sake, probably a robotic arm of course), and it would move in the same way. That's what's going on in the story.
To go back to Maxwell's demon, it would be like having a box, and a demon opening and closing the door to separate hot and cold molecules. Then I take the box with the same exact molecular positions/velocities, and open and close the box in the same exact manner as the demon was doing. I will get the same results as the demon does.
The most immediate argument against this process being possible is that it's impossible to exactly replicate what the demon does, and have the exact same box again, and that being slightly wrong will cause the chaotic system to fall apart and render my opening and closing of the box meaningless. However, in the case of the three body problem, if I accelerate the body slightly differently, or put it in a slightly different starting position, the movement that I make the body perform will still be very close to what it originally did (in fact, it may even be a better approximation than it would be if I tried to reposition the three bodies and let them move again)
So the question of how chaotic the system is has to be applied specifically to consciousness/the brain. Specifically, how the neurons would fire in my brain are slightly different than everyone else's, even given the same stimuli. So you can argue that the input to the neurons is off from what it should be slightly when we apply it to the brain in the story. But this alone shouldn't be enough to kill consciousness: if you take a magnet and wave it around your skull, in theory it should induce some impulses amongst your neurons that are different from what would occur just by experiencing the things around you, but I doubt anyone would argue this means you lack consciousness.
On the other hand, in this case every neuron is receiving an input which is slightly off, which means that it triggers slightly differently from expected, which could result in an input which is more different from what the brain would have actually created. After a couple of rounds of this the neuron is just firing at random compared to what it would be doing if you were observing the stimuli that the scientists are attempting to re-create.
I see no reason why scientists should be able to perfectly re-create the input necessary for each neuron, similarly to how it would be impossible to perfectly re-create the box that Maxwell's demon has taught me how to divide into hot/cold
To go back to Maxwell's demon, it would be like having a box, and a demon opening and closing the door to separate hot and cold molecules. Then I take the box with the same exact molecular positions/velocities, and open and close the box in the same exact manner as the demon was doing. I will get the same results as the demon does.
The most immediate argument against this process being possible is that it's impossible to exactly replicate what the demon does, and have the exact same box again, and that being slightly wrong will cause the chaotic system to fall apart and render my opening and closing of the box meaningless. However, in the case of the three body problem, if I accelerate the body slightly differently, or put it in a slightly different starting position, the movement that I make the body perform will still be very close to what it originally did (in fact, it may even be a better approximation than it would be if I tried to reposition the three bodies and let them move again)
So the question of how chaotic the system is has to be applied specifically to consciousness/the brain. Specifically, how the neurons would fire in my brain are slightly different than everyone else's, even given the same stimuli. So you can argue that the input to the neurons is off from what it should be slightly when we apply it to the brain in the story. But this alone shouldn't be enough to kill consciousness: if you take a magnet and wave it around your skull, in theory it should induce some impulses amongst your neurons that are different from what would occur just by experiencing the things around you, but I doubt anyone would argue this means you lack consciousness.
On the other hand, in this case every neuron is receiving an input which is slightly off, which means that it triggers slightly differently from expected, which could result in an input which is more different from what the brain would have actually created. After a couple of rounds of this the neuron is just firing at random compared to what it would be doing if you were observing the stimuli that the scientists are attempting to re-create.
I see no reason why scientists should be able to perfectly re-create the input necessary for each neuron, similarly to how it would be impossible to perfectly re-create the box that Maxwell's demon has taught me how to divide into hot/cold