What Is the Speed of an Oscillating Particle at Equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goonking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Position
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the speed of an oscillating particle at its equilibrium position, specifically within the context of simple harmonic motion. Participants explore the relationship between displacement, velocity, and angular velocity, as well as the implications of various parameters in the equations governing oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the oscillation of a particle, questioning the maximum speed at equilibrium and the calculations involved in determining angular velocity. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between average speed and instantaneous speed, as well as the correct interpretation of the equations governing simple harmonic motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the use of relevant equations and suggesting resources for further understanding. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the correct values for amplitude and angular velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the timing of measurements and the accuracy of calculated values. There is an emphasis on ensuring correct parameters are used in calculations, as well as the importance of understanding the underlying principles of oscillatory motion.

goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



2WGbXQi.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


the particle is oscillating

so we know at 1.5 seconds, it is at the equilibrium point , where speed is highest. (the speeds are 0 at the highest and lowest points of the graph.)

we see that it goes from -6m to 6m, which is 12 meters in 1 second.

so is the answer 12 meters per second? since that is the highest it can go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the equations that govern simple harmonic motion?
 
AlephNumbers said:
Are you familiar with the equations that govern simple harmonic motion?
no sir, i will google it right now.
 
goonking said:

Homework Statement



2WGbXQi.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


the particle is oscillating

so we know at 1.5 seconds, it is at the equilibrium point , where speed is highest. (the speeds are 0 at the highest and lowest points of the graph.)

we see that it goes from -6m to 6m, which is 12 meters in 1 second.

so is the answer 12 meters per second? since that is the highest it can go?
That's just the average speed from t = 1 second to t = 2 seconds .
 
goonking said:
so we need to use v = ω A cos ωt ?

Yes.
 
AlephNumbers said:
Yes.
how do we find angular velocity? Is the particle moving around in a circle? I thought it was more like a spring, going back and forth.
 
  • #10
goonking said:
I thought it was more like a spring, going back and forth.

It is.

goonking said:
Is the particle moving around in a circle?

No, but its horizontal displacement is the same as if it were moving in uniform circular motion. I would look at a textbook or online resource for a more complete explanation.

goonking said:
how do we find angular velocity?

The distance between two crests (high points) on the graph you provided is the amount of time it takes the mass to make a complete "revolution" (2π radians). Angular velocity is measured in radians per second... do you see where I am going with this?
 
  • #11
yes, so it takes 2 seconds to do 1 rev.

so 2π radians in 2 secs , 1 radian per sec.

ω = 1 radian per sec.

A = 3 meters

and cos ω t = cos ((1r/s) (2 second)) = .99939
v = ω A cos ωt = 1 x 3 x .999 = 3 m/s

correct?
 
  • #12
goonking said:
so 2π radians in 2 secs , 1 radian per sec.

On a bit of a physics binge, eh? Don't worry, PF has you covered.
 
  • #13
Draw a straight line with slope 3 m/s through the point (1.5s, 0 m) to check...
 
  • #14
AlephNumbers said:
(2π)/2 = π radians per second.

On a bit of a physics binge, eh? Don't worry, PF has you covered.
yes, silly me always doing homework when everyone is asleep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlephNumbers
  • #15
Well done !
 
  • #16
AlephNumbers said:
(2π)/2 = π radians per second.
whoops, yes.

and cos ω t = cos ((π r/s) (2 second)) = .9984

answer still came out to be 3 m/s.
 
  • #17
BvU said:
Draw a straight line with slope 3 m/s through the point (1.5s, 0 m) to check...
like this?
VLjU4HS.png


I have no idea how to confirm if that is suppose to correct or not.
 
  • #18
No, I think BvU meant more like this
SnapshotSHM.jpg
 
  • #19
AlephNumbers said:
No, I think BvU meant more like thisView attachment 82264

i think he was trying to tell me my answer was wrong.

by the looks of it, my speed should be -3m/s instead of 3 m/s.

correct?
 
  • #20
goonking said:
i think he was trying to tell me my answer was wrong.

by the looks of it, my speed should be -3m/s instead of 3 m/s.

correct?

You just drew a tangent line at t = 2.5 instead of t = 1.5. At t = 2.5 the mass has a negative velocity. I believe BvU was just pointing out that you could draw a line tangent to the graph in order to check your answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
AlephNumbers said:
No, you solved the problem. You just drew a tangent line at t = 2.5 instead of t = 1.5. At t = 2.5 the mass has a negative velocity. I believe BvU was just pointing out that you could draw a line tangent to the graph in order to check your answer.
oh wow, i meant to draw at 1.5 sec, not 2.5 sec, truly sorry!
 
  • #22
goonking said:
oh wow, i meant to draw at 1.5 sec, not 2.5 sec, truly sorry!
the answer should be 3 m/s then , right?
 
  • #23
goonking said:
yes, so it takes 2 seconds to do 1 rev.

so 2π radians in 2 secs , 1 radian per sec.

ω = 1 radian per sec.

A = 3 meters

and cos ω t = cos ((1r/s) (2 second)) = .99939
v = ω A cos ωt = 1 x 3 x .999 = 3 m/s

correct?

Your value of A is not correct. It should be the maximum displacement. Also, make sure to use the correct value for ω.
 
  • #24
AlephNumbers said:
Your value of A is not correct. It should be the maximum displacement. Also, make sure to use the correct value for ω.

sorry, let me fix that.

A = 6 meters.
ω = π r/s

correct?
 
  • #25
goonking said:
sorry, let me fix that.

A = 6 meters.
ω = π r/s

correct?

Looks good!
 
  • #26
AlephNumbers said:
Looks good!
getting an answer to be 18.7 m/s.

if i want to check that, I would need to graph a line with slope 18.7?!
 
  • #27
Yes. If you draw a line tangent to the graph at t = 1.5 you should get a line that has a slope of about 18.7
 
  • #28
AlephNumbers said:
Yes. If you draw a line tangent to the graph at t = 1.5 you should get a line that has a slope of about 18.7
awesome, thanks!
 
  • #29
The line you drew is going through (2.5 s, 0 m) and has a slope 18 m/s.
Two out of three ain't bad, but here only one out of three values is as intended.

Coincidentally the 18 m/s is close to the correct answer of ##A\omega## where you found the wrong value for two out of two. That's not good at all. Fortunately, you already fixed the ##\omega = {2\pi\over 2} \ne 1##.

Fixing a factor of ##\pi## corrects one error in your answer. Guess what's wrong with the other...

Perhaps now you can draw a line that is going through (2.5 s, 0m) and has a slope 6##\pi## m/s to check that that is indeed the correct answer :smile: .
 
  • #30
BvU said:
The line you drew is going through (2.5 s, 0 m) and has a slope 18 m/s.
Two out of three ain't bad, but here only one out of three values is as intended.

Coincidentally the 18 m/s is close to the correct answer of ##A\omega## where you found the wrong value for two out of two. That's not good at all. Fortunately, you already fixed the ##\omega = {2\pi\over 2} \ne 1##.

Fixing a factor of ##\pi## corrects one error in your answer. Guess what's wrong with the other...

Perhaps now you can draw a line that is going through (2.5 s, 0m) and has a slope 6##\pi## m/s to check that that is indeed the correct answer :smile: .
why does it have to be 2.5 s? don't you mean 1.5 s?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K