What Is the Speed of Sound and Vibration in Solids?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ronie Bayron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solids Sound Vibration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of sound varies significantly between different media, with sound traveling at approximately 330 m/s in air and around 5000 m/s in steel. In a scenario involving a 10 km pipeline, the mechanical impact of a collision will reach the far end before the sound does, due to the higher speed of sound in the solid material. Additionally, sound waves in confined environments, such as a pipe, experience less attenuation compared to those traveling through air. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications involving sound and vibration in solids.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave propagation in different media
  • Knowledge of mechanical waves and their characteristics
  • Familiarity with the speed of sound in various materials (e.g., air, steel, water)
  • Basic concepts of wave attenuation and its effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the speed of sound in various materials, including water and different metals
  • Explore the principles of wave attenuation in different environments
  • Study the differences between mechanical waves and sound waves
  • Investigate real-world applications of sound propagation in engineering and construction
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and anyone involved in construction or materials science who needs to understand the dynamics of sound and vibration in solids.

Ronie Bayron
Messages
146
Reaction score
23
Say, I have 10 Km (1m dia.) exposed pipeline under construction phase. 9 Km of the pipe line was already done. Its so happen that at the next pipe length installation, the plane operator mishandled the pipe and it collided at the end where connection should be made, big time that the magnitude of the force would enough to make impact on mountings, support braces of the pipe.

Which would you think arrive first at the other end? Is it the mechanical impact or the sound of impact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why assume arrival times are different?
 
Hi and welcome.
It would be the speed of sound in the two media that counts here. Sound in air travels at about 330m/s and 5000m/s in steel. Put your ear to the pipe and you would hear that long before the sound of the crash got to you. Also, because the sound energy in the pipe wall does not spread out, as it does in air, the sound would be less attenuated. At 9km, the sound would hardly get to you, via the air, except on a very quite night.
Remember the cowboy films in which the outlaws stick their ears on the railroad track to detect an oncoming train? Well, it made sense - unlike a lot of other Hollywood notions.
 
You're asking does sound travel through solids faster than its speed through air.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
Why assume arrival times are different?

Hi, to you sir thank you for the response. I am intrigue on the fact, that there is a little confusions I got from the fundamentals I learned about sound and mechanical vibration.
water-droplet-585x298.jpg
say I am a fish(sensitive to sound) which is 5m away from the droplet. Which will reach me first (the sound or the first wave that travels along the surface?
 
Last edited:
sophiecentaur said:
Hi and welcome.
It would be the speed of sound in the two media that counts here. Sound in air travels at about 330m/s and 5000m/s in steel. Put your ear to the pipe and you would hear that long before the sound of the crash got to you. Also, because the sound energy in the pipe wall does not spread out, as it does in air, the sound would be less attenuated. At 9km, the sound would hardly get to you, via the air, except on a very quite night.
Remember the cowboy films in which the outlaws stick their ears on the railroad track to detect an oncoming train? Well, it made sense - unlike a lot of other Hollywood notions.
Yes thank you, i know.
 
Last edited:
Ronie Bayron said:
say I am a fish(sensitive to sound) which is 5m away from the droplet. Which will reach me first (the sound or the first wave that travels along the surface?

The speed of sound in water is usually much much faster than a surface wave. However some tsunami waves do travel very fast.
 
sophiecentaur said:
. Put your ear to the pipe and you would hear that long before the sound of the crash got to you. Also, because the sound energy in the pipe wall does not spread out, as it does in air, the sound would be less attenuated. At 9km, the sound would hardly get to you, via the air, except on a very quite night.

or a variation on that ...
consider the sound wave that is traveling in the air, within the pipe
It is well confined like a wave guide. there's going to be a lot less attenuation of that sound wave ( compared to the free air one)
but, yes, the metallic clang is still going to arrive firstDave
 
davenn said:
or a variation on that ...
consider the sound wave that is traveling in the air, within the pipe
It is well confined like a wave guide. there's going to be a lot less attenuation of that sound wave ( compared to the free air one)
Quiz Question -- What does the clang sound like when it arrives at the far end?

(It helps if you've ever been to the Exploratorium in San Francisco, and clapped your hands at the base of the long reflecting tube...) :smile:

http://www.exploratorium.edu/explore

EDIT
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #10
Ronie Bayron said:
the sound or the first wave that travels along the surface
That picture is of a surface wave. That is not how a fish will hear sound through the water, which is a compression wave in the body of the water. Surface waves, as we have all seen, travel at (depending on the wavelength) between mm/s and a few m/s. The speed of compression waves is much higher (as stated earlier) than sound (also compression) waves in air.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ronie Bayron
  • #11
Ronie Bayron said:
Which would you think arrive first at the other end? Is it the mechanical impact or the sound of impact?

The answer might depend on the definition of "mechanical impact" vs "sound of impact".

If we graph the x (horizontal) position of the non-impacted end of the pipe vs time, what would the graph look like? Would it have an initial interval where it just oscillated? Or would the initial interval be a steady increase or decrease before we saw any oscillation superimposed on the shape of the graph?
 
  • #12
Stephen Tashi said:
The answer might depend on the definition of "mechanical impact" vs "sound of impact".

If we graph the x (horizontal) position of the non-impacted end of the pipe vs time, what would the graph look like? Would it have an initial interval where it just oscillated? Or would the initial interval be a steady increase or decrease before we saw any oscillation superimposed on the shape of the graph?
Thank you, Stephen Tashi. I get it now.

It would take a minimal effort to be heard, other than carrying the whole baggage of clothes of my wife at the airport:smile:. (A parallel) So, sound travels fast than the ,mechanical wave on the surface.
 
  • #13
Ronie Bayron said:
So, sound travels fast than the ,mechanical wave on the surface.

on the surface of what ?

did you not read the other responses ?

mechanical wave within the metal of the pipe is always going to be faster than the sound wave in the air
the same for water or any other liquid or solid relative to air/ other gas

seismic waves in the "solid' Earth travel at around 8km / sec ... they are a mechanical wave
In dry air at 20 °C, the speed of sound is 343.2 metres / sec very much slower

Tsunami waves in the open ocean are a bit of a different mechanism and they have a speed of around 800 km / hr ( varies with ocean depth)Dave
 
  • #14
davenn said:
on the surface of what ?

did you not read the other responses ?

mechanical wave within the metal of the pipe is always going to be faster than the sound wave in the air
the same for water or any other liquid or solid relative to air/ other gas

seismic waves in the "solid' Earth travel at around 8km / sec ... they are a mechanical wave
In dry air at 20 °C, the speed of sound is 343.2 metres / sec very much slower

Tsunami waves in the open ocean are a bit of a different mechanism and they have a speed of around 800 km / hr ( varies with ocean depth)Dave
Yes, thank you Davenn. I am settled for my answer for the moment. I might cross the other side so soon enough that things will become a bit more complicated for me to solve.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #15
davenn said:
Tsunami waves in the open ocean are a bit of a different mechanism and they have a speed of around 800 km / hr
This is true but the wave speed of a surface water wave is wavelength dependent. The speed can, as I stated earlier, be just a few mm per second. The surface wave speed could never exceed the bulk pressure wave speed (P waves).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
842
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K