What is the theoretical proof of the quantization of the energy of the EM field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The quantization of the energy of the electromagnetic (EM) field is established through the canonical quantization procedure, which involves solving the Schrödinger equation and deriving the Hermite equation. This leads to the identification of normalizable solutions for a discrete energy spectrum. The electromagnetic field is treated within a bounded cavity, where the field Lagrangian is expressed in terms of operators, and commutation relations are applied. This process results in the conclusion that the energy of the EM field is quantized, with creation and annihilation operators representing photons, although Dr. Daniel Steck emphasizes that this is a postulate rather than a proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger equation and Hermite equation
  • Familiarity with canonical quantization and operator formalism
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field theory and Lagrangian mechanics
  • Experience with commutation relations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the canonical quantization procedure in detail
  • Explore the derivation of the Hamiltonian for the electromagnetic field
  • Read "Quantum Optics" by Zubairy and Scully for foundational concepts
  • Investigate Mark Srednicki's field theory book for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in quantum optics who seek to understand the theoretical foundations of energy quantization in electromagnetic fields.

Abu Abdallah
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,
The energy of the quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator is proved to
be quantized after solving the Schrodingers equation which leads to Hermite equation and discovering that normalizable solutions of the wavefunction exist only for a discrete spectrum of energy. When the electromagnetic field is quantized in the beginning of any textbook on Quantum Optics, (see for example Zubairy and Scully), the field is supposed to be inside a bounded cavity and is decomposed into the normal modes of this cavity. The conjugate coordinates and momentum that comprise the field Lagrangian are
converted into operators and the commutation relations between qi and
pi, namely: [qi,pj]=i hbar.delta ij are imposed on the generalized coordinate
and momentum. The operators a, a+ are directly produced from these
generalized coordinates and momenta and by writing the Hamiltonian of
the field we discover that it's of the same form of the hamiltonian of
the mechanical quantum harmonic oscillator. We then jump to the
conclusion that the energy of the EM field is also quantized and the
operators a, a+ are creation and annihilation operators of photons!
Is this a sound proof for the quantization of the energy of
electromagnetic field? I don't think so...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I received this answer from Dr. Daniel Steck :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi (...)
That book isn't my preferred one for thorough treatments, but the
basic idea is that there is no proof for quantizing the
electromagnetic field, you *postulate* that there is a quantum
description of the EM field. The quantization procedure (where you
identify cononical coordinates and promote them to operators) is the
standard way of constructing the quantum model from the classical
model. The normal-mode decomposition is a trick to make the
quantization easier, otherwise you have to deal with field operators
as the fundamental object, which are much more complicated.

Hope that helps.

Daniel A. Steck
Oregon Center for Optics and Department of Physics
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't it strange that we can't prove the quantization of EM energy ?!
 
Last edited:
You can't really "prove" any of quantum mechanics, you just go through the canonical quantization procedure. To do the same thing for the EM field, you just write down the classical field lagrangian, find the conjugate momentum, write down the hamiltonian, and use the commutation relations. I'm not sure why this is terribly peculiar. Mark Srednicki does this very early in his field theory book, which you can find on-line for free.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K